[ad_1]
The United States Ambassador to Lebanon, Dorothy Shea, indicated that “the recent United States Undersecretary of State, David Hale, in Lebanon had several objectives for his visit to Beirut, and he wanted to present as a result of the terrible explosion that occurred on In August, the American people personally expressed their condolences, monitored the effects of the disaster, and discussed with a group of interlocutors about ways forward in Lebanon. In addition to her meeting with various government and political leaders, Hill met with outsiders, such as civil society activists and Students and NGO volunteers on the ground. “
In an interview with Al-Modon, Xia noted: “Hill benefited from this visit to shed light on the many ways the United States supports the people of Lebanon after the terrible tragedy of August 4. I can tell you that I made our priorities with him around Determining the immediate means to provide the Lebanese with urgent and emergency humanitarian aid, “noting that” days after the explosion in the port of Beirut, I was at the airport to receive five transport planes from the C-17 and C-130, which were brought with her emergency supplies, such as food, water and essential supplies for the hospitals. She welcomed the five teams and explained the importance of what they are doing. He thanked them for helping them deliver important aid directly into the hands of those affected by the disaster. I can’t tell you how happy I was to see dozens and dozens of platforms. The mobile is launched from those planes, knowing that it will reach the victims through our most trusted partners. “
He revealed that “so far, the United States has allocated more than $ 18.1 million in aid to Lebanon. US Under Secretary of State David Hale indicated our intention to provide urgently needed additional support through the Global Program. of the United Nations Food to allow the continued availability of wheat and grains “. The other, despite the massive damage to the port’s infrastructure, would also like to point out, that while the United States supports the Lebanese people to provide the necessary humanitarian assistance during this critical time, we must point out that this immediate humanitarian response does not cancel the need. for Lebanon’s leaders to enact the necessary reforms that put the country on a more sustainable path. They must restore the confidence of the Lebanese and the international community and facilitate long-term international investment and aid.
On the other hand, Xia stated: “We meet regularly with international partners who share our desire to see Lebanon and its people march towards prosperity. In this regard, we have kept in especially close contact with our French counterparts. The French proposal is refers solely to the French; the United States has focused, for its part. The urgent need to form a new government that has the intention and the ability to implement long-awaited economic reforms, to help restore the collapsed Lebanese economy, to rest on a solid foundation We also cooperate with the international community through the International Support Group for Lebanon.
He continued: “When I speak of the United States’ bilateral relations with Lebanon, I point out that we have been a committed partner for decades, working side by side with the Lebanese on issues of education, humanitarian aid, and improving security, stability and security. Lebanon’s sovereignty. When we discuss the Hezbollah issue, it remains. ” The position of the United States is clear. Our senior leaders in the State Department and the White House made it clear, and I personally echoed it more than once, and its tenor: Hezbollah’s terrorist and illegal activities in Lebanon show that it cares more. for their interests than for what is best for Lebanon and the Lebanese people.
Regarding the French president’s talk about a change in the Lebanese system and whether regional and international conditions allow the Lebanese to move to a new system and change the sectarian system, Chia replied: “I think the Lebanese should determine the answer to this he asks. On his last visit, Hill spoke about the urgent need. ” Let Lebanon’s elected leaders put aside party concerns and interests and act in the national interest. Focusing on what is best for the future of Lebanon and seeking the best means to address systemic corruption and mismanagement is the key to a bright future for this country and its people. Therefore, only Lebanon can decide the formula for success. , No external actors or influencers. “
Regarding the truth about the leaks about the upcoming sanctions against Lebanese officials, including the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, Gebran Bassil, he commented: “I will not address the rumors that are spreading, but I can focus on the facts of our sanctions policy. . “The US administration not only aims to stop the flow of money to ‘malicious forces’, including Iran, but also to change the behavior of malicious actors and their allies. At the same time, I would like to emphasize that sanctions do not They aim to harm ordinary Lebanese citizens Neither Lebanon nor its economy is weakened I will mention here that the country’s economic crisis is the result of decades of corruption and mismanagement.
He stressed that “reforms are the decision and responsibility of the Lebanese people and their government. It is not for the United States or any other international partner to dictate or lead these reforms. I can say that we, as the Lebanese people, base our vision on that corruption and mismanagement in various sectors, such as customs. ” The port, communications and electricity have had serious negative effects on the economy. The terrible explosion at the port can be seen as the result, in some respects, of corruption and mismanagement. We continue to encourage Lebanese leaders to ultimately listen and respond to the demands of their people. It is imperative that all government agencies and departments enact and implement much-needed reforms that can put the economy back on the right track. “
On the fate of UNIFIL, he emphasized, “I must say that Lebanon’s opportunity to advance the issue of border demarcation will represent good news for the country and the region. Certainly, the United States is ready to assist in the discussions, but in the end, it depends on the parties in conflict. ” In determining when they are ready to move forward on the issue of demarcation, like UNIFIL, it has an important role to play in border security. I have seen first-hand the value of the work they do and the difficulty of the operating environment in which they work. But given the many challenges UNIFIL faces as it seeks to fulfill the tasks stipulated in its mandate, I can say that it is not effective or to a lesser extent not as effective as it should be. For this reason, discussions were held at the United Nations on the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. To allow UNIFIL to fulfill its mission, and if it cannot do so, then it must be reported, and we must determine the size of its resources and operations based on this data. “
[ad_2]
