[ad_1]
The media department added in its statement that, “in its effort to confirm the facts and narrate the facts to avoid any confusion or distortion, it has made the following clear:
In the first place, the stations in which the government’s work was interrupted were not related to political differences between the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces, as Prime Minister Hariri tried to suggest, because these differences were technical over archives in which In front was the electricity file, and the objection was not limited to the forces, but the delay and the actual delay is due. Two main factors:
The first factor was that Prime Minister Hariri stood by Minister Gebran Bassil’s side by refusing to conduct a tender for electricity through the tender administration, and his insistence on dissolving the ships, prompting objection from various parties and it was a major controversial issue at the cabinet table, to which Prime Minister Hariri himself returned and addressed an issue. Electricity and the deficit it caused after his resignation from the government.
The second factor is the deliberate obstruction practiced by the other party during the long interim stage after the 2018 parliamentary elections by its insistence on a government according to its terms and interests, and instead of clinging to the formation of a government with the specifications required, Hariri resorted, as usual, to a method of detours and concessions that torpedoed the essence of government. Causes of the fall.
He added: “Secondly, we remind Prime Minister Hariri that the Maarab agreement, at the insistence of the forces, included what it included that the two parties (the forces and the movement) would appoint Saad Hariri (the most representative of his sect) to head the government without anyone else, and Hariri knows it thanks to the leadership of the forces with the best knowledge. “
He continued: “Third, there is no quota agreement between the forces and the movement under the table as suggested by Prime Minister Hariri, and what was mentioned in the Zain clause of the agreement is completely clear in terms of naming. powers on the basis of a clearly defined mechanism, this particular mechanism that Hariri did not adopt and the forces fought for his belief. That the administration has no reason for quotas, clientelism and subjugation, and the disagreement between the forces and free movement that Hariri endures more than possible was the freedom to support the forces in this dispute and nothing more, because the issues of dispute were not of a personal nature, but related to the direct interests of the people, and the positions of these forces were the revolution The white and constitutional precedents of the revolution, be it from electricity to monumental ships, water, communications, successive budgets and much others. And if Hariri had done them, surely many problems would have been solved, and the troop ministers perhaps would not have to resign, and the people would not need to rebel after that.
The media department confirmed that, “Fourth, the Lebanese Forces did not make the decision to nominate General Michel Aoun until after Hariri’s rise, and under the guise of the void and the child’s mother, and concern for the stability , in agreement with President Berri and Congressman Jumblatt to nominate a candidate as of March 8, and it was certain that a president had arrived as of March 8. At that time, the forces thought in this case that it was better to nominate Aoun, because he is the most represented in the March 8 team.
And he highlighted: “The failure in the assignment of the Lebanese Forces to President Hariri stems first from the rejection of the popular majority after the October 17 uprising of all those who were in power before that date, and second from his vision of rescue so that the country forms a government completely independent of all the political forces without exception after the failure occurred. It happened, and the nature of the exceptional period calls for the formation of a completely different government than the one that preceded it, starting from its president to its members and its work program, and by the way, if the Shiite duo stick exclusively to Prime Minister Hariri, Hariri must ask himself about the background of this accession. “
The media department stated that, “Sixthly, Al-Hariri had Prime Minister Hariri focus on the party that obstructed the French initiative and prevented the establishment of the state from 2005 to today, and should have taken into account the priority of to form a government of salvation that avoids collapse, instead of throwing accusations at random on Lebanese Forces. “
He noted that “the Lebanese forces wanted Prime Minister Hariri to recall the many and very great points of convergence in political speeches between the Lebanese Forces and the Movement of the Future, and to spend his time with the media highlighting the base and the core of the problem in Lebanon that led the country to what it had achieved, instead of being distracted. A partial nonsense regardless of the origin of the problem, does not advance, rather it delays, because it strikes the last hope that remains for the Lebanese. In all cases, the Lebanese Forces will continue to work on this basis, and will not enter into useless and useless political disputes, and this statement is only a clarification of some facts in the service of truth.
[ad_2]
