[ad_1]
Faten al-Hajj wrote in “Al-Akhbar”: Some private schools have benefited from the law suspending deadlines until December 31, due to the lack of determination to renew the contracts of teachers that they left between “the commentator “And” the divorced “, and subject to disbursement at any time. As for those who remain at work, you are not safe from the “heresies” that distance education produces, including the suspension of contracts and the charging of the allotment of hours for materials that are delivered “online” only.
Although it has been more than a month since the start of a new school year, the exchange books continue to reach teachers in the private sector. Until now, many of them do not know if their contracts with the schools will be renewed for the 2020-2021 academic year or not. There is no guarantee that any of them will finish their current year in peace, as long as the law that suspends the terms is in effect until December 31 at least. Thus, teachers may be surprised by the loss of their jobs at any time this school year, if the school administration wants to benefit from the maximum limits of the law introduced by Representative Yassin Jaber (which provides to suspend the effects of the contractual provisions related to the default in the payment of subsidized loans of all kinds. Any legal or contractual sanction, including the increase in the interest rate resulting from a delay or default in the payment of a loan, or any of its installments for a period of 6 months, starting 7/1/2020).
The dismissal of teachers has not stopped yet, according to the law, and reaped thousands in the last academic year under various headings: economic, precautionary, proactive and malicious spending, and the result is the same: teachers stripped of their acquired rights with the sword of arbitrary expulsion disguised with coercive resignations, and meager and selective compensations whose value diminishes. in every moment. Some schools used the “stifling economic situation” as an excuse to settle scores with union teachers who made up a significant percentage of the spent and are preparing to file lawsuits against their schools..
Tony Touma, one of the victims of the exchange. The drama teacher’s heart stopped after the headmistress of his school informed him that she would be doing without it this year. The head of the family passed away while all his pleas to stay in school did not work, not even in any job, be it in the administration or even in the maintenance department to feed his children..
There are no compelling positive reasons in the exchange stories, as one Catholic school teacher put it. He asks about the rule that prompts the administration of a private school to dispense with a 53-year-old teacher who “turned 27” and deprives her of health insurance for her and her mother and the pension she fought for during these years and that expires after two years. The teacher is confused when explaining the occurrence of a “death sentence” against 40 qualified teachers on the pretext of the economic situation. Such a situation does not affect the sister of a cleric, the family member of a civil servant or any other person with influence. Upon reaching 64 years, he would have changed his retirement age by nine years, during which his entire life would have changed in terms of qualifications or retirement pension. At 6 months, the teacher will receive a check for her compensation, but it will be frozen for a full year as there is no money in the compensation fund, she was informed. It is strange that the bank that takes care of the school asks the laid off teachers to pay the full value of the loans they owe, despite the fact that some have repaid their loan until 2024. One of them paid the bank all the money that took from the school in exchange for the arbitrary outlay. The teachers were forced to sign the resignation in exchange for half a salary for each year. This teacher will lose her health insurance at the end of 2020, and will leave without a pension, and in the next few days her family will be without a support, since the husband also lost his job. After 25 years of education, he could not afford a job opportunity at another school where he would start from scratch, as he was offered to start with a salary of 600,000 pounds. He rebuked the union that “did not support us and did not move, although we never took time to pay their contributions, obtain the membership card and participate in the election of their members. In fact, the union representatives considered that they gave us 50 percent of the salary every year is a fair offer. “
Source: News
