The dialogue committee between Bkerke and Hezbollah will meet soon: The Patriarch is besieging Baabda!

The Bkirki rally on Saturday appeared to be an attempt to revive March 14. The main objective is to confront Michel Aoun in the Christian arena, in an attempt to represent his representation of Christians. These attempts are not new. But what is new, and which constitutes a precedent, is that the Maronite Patriarchate seemed to be a spearhead for the presidency. The Maronite Patriarchate has always been the guardian of the presidency, even when it has not encountered him in the situation. Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir was a good example of this. Despite the great disagreement with former President Emile Lahoud, he remained an impregnable prey against any attempt to overthrow him, even during the height of the forces on March 14.

The conversation about an attempt to implicate Patriarch Bechara Al-Rai in the conflict is not exact. Al-Ra’i voluntarily, and in coordination with an Arab axis hostile to half the Lebanese, agreed to play this role. He did not object to calling a large group of Lebanese terrorists. He did not move when he heard one of the young men he met say that the president of the republic was a terrorist.
The Pastor was high with the “15 thousand” who came out with “hearts full of hope, courage and hope”, as he said, so they beat him as the leader of what was left of “March 14”. But the time is not the time of 2005, nor are the balances the same. Therefore, the effect of Bkerke’s words on the international conference will not differ much from the effect of speaking about neutrality. In both cases, a national consensus is required and the sponsor realizes that it is not available. However, the content of the speech is not important. The symbolism of the encounter is important. The context of the events confirms that the effects of the Bkerkei effect ended the following day. Three parties contributed to this: the president of the republic, Hezbollah, and the sponsor himself. The Aounist speech seemed restrained and was not drawn into a discussion with Bkerke, on the contrary, the Aounists suggested from before the festival until yesterday that the Patriarch was reading Al-Tayyar’s book. They also expressed their willingness to “discuss any proposal by the sponsor based on the sincere common effort to protect Lebanon.” As for Hezbollah, it realizes that to attack the President of the Republic and the Free Patriotic Movement in the Christian street, it is sometimes a direct target, and other times the weapon of resistance to blame it for the financial and economic situation. . crisis, and tell Christians that the movement’s ally is responsible for their suffering. Deputy Hassan Fadlallah said that “these people used Bkerke to abuse her in order to attack the President of the Republic and Hezbollah, but such an attack will not lead them to achieve their objectives.” However, he noted that “our policy is not based on boycotting due to differences of opinion. We are people of dialogue, encounter and national understanding. This is the basis for solving internal problems and not calling other countries. To intervene. Rather, it can be used to provide aid and assistance, not to replace the Lebanese. ‘

Al-Khazen and Ibrahim relayed messages between Al-Rahi and Hezbollah before Saturday

The third person who thwarted the effects of the Bkerke meeting was the sponsor himself. The information indicates that in a television interview broadcast today, he will seek to correct his position, especially in terms of confirming the neutrality of the Presidency of the Republic in the face of any conflict, especially because in his speech he never mentioned the President of the Republic. while holding Hezbollah extensively responsible.
However, the lines of communication between Bkerke and Hezbollah have not been broken. Fadlallah revealed that the dialogue committee between the two parties had contacted two days ago to study the possibility of resuming direct meetings taking the necessary precautions from Corona. While the information confirmed that the committee could hold a meeting soon, Fadlallah said that “in light of the committee’s discussions, a meeting with the Patriarch could be held.”
Al-Akhbar learned that the contact took place between the two members of the committee, Muhammad al-Khansa and Prince Harith Shihab. It was also found that MP Farid Al-Khazen relayed messages between the sponsor and the party, related to mutual clarifications. The Maronite Patriarch did not demand internationalization in the sense of going to the Security Council and using force of arms, nor did Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah refer to Al-Ra’i when he said: “No one jokes with us on the issue of internationalization , and any conversation about an international resolution under Chapter Seven is rejected and surprising, and is seen as a call to war and a cover for a new occupation. ” Also, the visit of the Director General of Public Security, Major General Abbas Ibrahim Bkerke, brought “what contributes to calm the climate” between the party and the sponsor.

Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here