[ad_1]
World_Lebanon
The Criminal Court of Cassation under the presidency of Judge Jamal Al-Hajjar initiated the procedures to notify the litigating parties in the case of the bomb attack in the port of Beirut, the content of the memorandum presented by the two former ministers, Ali Hassan Khalil and Ghazi Zuaiter, requesting that the case be transferred from the custody of the judicial investigator, Judge Fadi Sawan, on “legitimate suspicion”, to another judge, and inviting them to present their responses to this memorandum.
The notification procedures began with Judge Sawan, who began the preparation of his answer to the memorandum, for which he hastened to temporarily suspend the investigation in the file pending the decision of the Court of Cassation, and the Public Ministry was informed of Cassation of the matter, provided that the other parties, including the Bar Association, are informed early next week. His agency on behalf of the affected plaintiffs, the families of the victims and all the defendants, who are arrested and not, and Judge Al-Hajjar asked Sawan to provide them with numbers, addresses and the names of his legal representatives.
The discriminatory nature of the discriminatory position of the Prosecutor’s Office on this memorandum is not yet known, especially because the discriminatory prosecutor, Judge Ghassan Oweidat, refrained from examining this file and commenting on any review in this regard, due to his kinship relationship with the deputy Zuaiter. Due to the latter’s dedication to investigating the international judicial assignments received by the Public Ministry of Cassation in recent days, and his concern to investigate files related to the orders issued by Interpol International, so that Kabalan could send the results of these investigations to the countries involved at the specified times, while the lawyer will probably take over. The General Committee on Discrimination responds to the memorandum of Khalil and Zuaiter, and leaves it to the Court of Cassation to adopt the decision it deems appropriate, which meets the interest of the investigation and takes into account the interests of the victims affected by the port explosion.
