[ad_1]
Yesterday, the prosecution forwarded the discriminatory accusation to the judicial investigator of the crime of the attack on the port, judge Fadi Sawan, the investigations carried out by the Jordanian judicial authorities on the matter of the ship “Roussos” based on the dispatch of the discriminatory prosecutor, judge Ghassan Oweidat , through an international mandate through Interpol requesting the Jordanian authorities to investigate the Jordanian authorities. Those who contributed to the stay of the ship in Beirut and its exposure to damage that prevented it from leaving, in the context of a request from the ship to transport seismic survey equipment from Beirut and unload it in the Jordanian port of Aqaba through a shipping agent from a company that has offices in Jordan, while the Prosecutor’s Office awaits a similar response from the Mozambican authorities to delegate The international issued in the same file referred to the fact that “Roussos” had departed from the port of “Batumi” in Georgia to the port of “Baira” in Mozambique before deviating from its specified course while at sea at the request of the ship’s owner to proceed subsequently to the Port of Beirut.
In the data obtained by “Nidaa Al Watan” on the investigations being carried out abroad into the case, the Information Division of the Internal Security Forces had sent its officers to Turkey to investigate the so-called Muhammad Hantis to Request of Judge Oweidat, who is the intermediary who brought Via the Roussos ship to the port of Beirut to transport seismic survey equipment.
During his questioning by information officers in coordination with the Turkish side, Hantis reported that he had received a call from the Kojic Company of Lebanon and a Jordanian person requesting insurance for a ship carrying seismic prospecting equipment from Beirut to Aqaba, and as a result presented to the company “quotes”. She chose “Roussos” because it was “the cheapest”, then Hanes linked the two stakeholders of the Kojic company with the Russian shipowner in Cyprus, and the contract was concluded between them to hire “Roussos” and assign him to the task. to transport equipment from the port of Beirut. At that time, Hantis’s role ended and the Information Division submitted its report on the investigations that had been conducted with her in Turkey to the Public Prosecutor for Cassation, who in turn forwarded the report to Judge Sawan.
And to Cyprus, the information officers also had a role in the investigation process with the Russian owner of the ship, since, after communicating via Interpol with the Cypriot authorities, the latter asked the Lebanese side to send the questions they wanted. ask the owner of the boat so that Cyprus could investigate it, and it happened, but the answers I received. The information “was later unsatisfactory, so the division again requested that its officers come in person to question him. The Cypriot authorities agreed, and the information team traveled by helicopter from the Lebanese army to Cyprus, where they interrogated to the Russian owner of the “Roussos”, who seemed elusive in his responses and argued that “she does not remember anything but the ship. I arrived in Lebanon and accumulated debts with her, and after that, he did not pursue the matter!
And based on the fact that “his statement is not convincing and inconsistent”, Awaidat asked the prosecution against him and asked Interpol to draw up an international arrest warrant against him. However, some legal sources indicate that he is currently fortified with international law that allows Cyprus not to extradite him to Lebanon but to his homeland, Russia, if it so chooses. Delivered under the international note.
