Resolve on the line created by the Lebanese government … and Jumblatt for Hariri: “Beware of his betrayal and hatred” – (tweet)



[ad_1]

Beirut – “Al-Quds Al-Arabi”:

If expectations are correct, the birth of the next government headed by Prime Minister Saad Hariri will not halt after exceeding the size of the knot in favor of the Prime Minister-designate’s suggestion that it be 18 ministers. This atmosphere took place after the negative nature of the composition scene and the accusations of the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, Deputy Gebran Bassil, of entering the line of the Baabda Palace, which caused the obstruction of the distribution of suitcases and the rigor in Christian participation and the creation of a Druze complex, before both Basilio and the Presidency of the Republic issued denials of any influence from the president Please transmit the creation process.

However, a remarkable tweet in its timing and significance launched by the president of the Progressive Socialist Party, former MP Walid Jumblatt, on his Twitter page, raised a question about his background, where he said: “One of the wonders of ministerial theater is that those who did not name Saad Hariri except the forces are today those who share seats and are preparing to take full power in all its security and judicial branches in the scheme of nullity, isolation and revenge. Therefore, O Sheikh Saad, from the position of concern for Taif, pay attention to his betrayal and his historical hatred.

It was clear that Jumblatt winked from the channel of the leader of the Free Patriotic Movement who did not name Hariri, along with Hezbollah and Prince Talal Arslan, and that Jumblatt winked from a channel where the president and the movement receive the portfolios of internal security and defense and the justice portfolio.

Under the 18 ministers formula, the government is divided equally between 9 Christian ministers and 9 Muslim ministers.

Under the formula of 18 ministers, the government is divided equally between 9 Christian ministers and 9 Muslim ministers, including 4 Maronite ministers, 3 Greek Orthodox ministers, a Catholic, an Armenian, 4 Sunni ministers, 4 Shiite ministers and a Druze. Hariri stressed that the rotation should be between sects and not between parties, with the exception of the bag of money that would be left for the Shiite community based on an earlier promise from the Shiite duo.

However, the President’s acceptance of the formation of the 18 ministers raised a question about what he would receive in return and whether the price would be for the Energy Ministry to stay within the “strong block of Lebanon” by assigning it to an Armenian close to the Tashnak party or a person suggested by Representative Basil Kabiyar Khoury.

In the line of Minister Basil and in the proposal to represent Arslan with a Christian minister, information emerged that drew attention to a specific stage, and this coincided with the movement of consultations that took place between the President of Parliament, Nabih Berri, and the general director of Public Security, Major General Abbas Ibrahim, to facilitate the task of shaping and distributing portfolios. According to unified standards, without affirming the imminent birth of the government this week, based on the words of President Berri: “What Foul says will be appropriate.”

Regarding the positions, the political council of the “Lebanese Democratic” party warned in a statement after its meeting headed by the deputy Arslan in Khaldeh “of the seriousness of what is happening behind the scenes of the formation of the government where the bad intentions appear of most parties, and the composition is based on quotas, malice and greed, as if nothing had happened. ” The voice of the people that has risen from one year to the present has no value “, considering that” the data available up to this moment presage a political government par excellence, under the misleading slogan called Government of Specialists. “

The Council affirmed its position “rejecting the exclusion of the Druze by reducing their representation and the insistence of some on harming the right of an established sect for the Lebanese entity only to satisfy one party at the expense of another, and indifference to manipulation of the Druze internal balances, which we consider a conspiracy against their history and future, and in national balances, especially in light of emerging regional and international developments and their possible reflection at home through new political contracts.



[ad_2]