[ad_1]
Minutes after the US media announced the victory of the Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, in the heated race for the US presidency, President Donald Trump rejected the result, indicating that he would prove in court that he was the winner.
“The simple truth is that the elections are still far from over,” Trump said in a statement. He added: “It is the legal voices that determine the president, not the media.”
But experts say it will be difficult for Trump to change the outcome unless he provides evidence of widespread vote-tally fraud that has changed the results in multiple states.
Irvine Richard Hasen, an electoral law expert at the University of California, says: “Trump’s litigation strategy will not lead to any results. It will not make a difference in the outcome of the election.”
Trump said his campaign team will go to court on Monday “to ensure that electoral laws are fully upheld and that the real winner takes office.”
He indicated that he hopes to recount the votes in the states, where Biden leads with just a few thousand votes.
He spoke specifically of Pennsylvania, where Republicans point to fraud and say thousands of ballots received after the deadline have been billed against the law.
OBSERVERS WERE NOT ALLOWED IN THE COUNTER ROOMS. I WON THE ELECTIONS, I OBTAINED 71,000,000 LEGAL VOTES. BAD THINGS HAPPENED THAT OUR OBSERVERS COULD NOT SEE. IT NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. MILLIONS OF TICKETS IN THE MAIL WERE SENT TO PEOPLE WHO NEVER REQUESTED THEM!
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2020
“The (media) networks have no right to decide the outcome of the elections. The courts do that. The courts annul the elections when they are illegal,” Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer, said Saturday in Philadelphia, the largest city in the United States. Pennsylvania.
A reminder of what happened in Florida: is Trump right?
Elections don’t actually end until each state officially shows the number of votes in them, which will happen in the next few weeks.
But with all the more than 150 million votes counted, Trump did not get enough votes from the electorate that officially elects the president, according to a unanimous consensus in the American media on Saturday.
The candidates have already taken refuge in the courts. In 2000, when the electoral battle between Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore was taking place in Florida, where Bush was leading by just over 500 votes, the matter was taken to the Supreme Court for a recount in the state. .
And the court rejected a recount, leading to the announcement of Bush’s victory.
But in Trump’s case, not only would he have to overcome a gap of nearly 40,000 votes in Pennsylvania, he would also fall by thousands of votes in Nevada, Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin.
It is highly unlikely that the Supreme Court will annul the election results with this difference in several states.
Count
Counts are expected in Wisconsin and Georgia, and possibly other states.
But a recount rarely changes an election. In 2016, Wisconsin’s recount added 131 votes to Trump, who was already ahead of then-Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
“In recent US elections, the recount has almost never changed the results by more than a few hundred votes,” said Ohio State University election law expert Stephen Hefner.
Trump’s team hoped Pennsylvania would reverse its decision months ago to accept mail-in ballots up to three days after Election Day.
Republicans appealed the decision to the Supreme Court in October, but their justices were divided in their opinions on the matter (four favored and four rejected) so the decision remained the same. But the court said it could review the matter after the elections.
Now that he has the total number of nine justices he needs after Trump appointed conservative Amy Connie Barrett, Republicans are seeking a new court session to hear the case.
But Pennsylvania officials point out that the number of ballots the court can decide not to count does not exceed a few thousand, which is far less than the number Trump needs to beat Biden.
“It is difficult to see how the ballots in question could be related to the outcome of the election,” Pennsylvania state affairs official Cathy Bukfar said in a plea sent to court on Saturday.
Falsification?
Trump insists there is fraud. To overcome Biden’s leadership, this would have to be tested in multiple states and the tens of thousands of votes his opponent got would have to be canceled.
Trump’s team has yet to provide any evidence.
Giuliani said Saturday that the city of Philadelphia, which is often very Democratic, has a “sad history of election fraud,” noting that some of the ballots that arrived have the names of the dead.
“This is certainly sufficient evidence to cancel the counting of a certain number of votes. This will affect the elections,” he said.
But according to Hefner, the Republican accusations are “vague.”
“You have to present facts to back up your claims,” he said, adding that even with evidence, Republicans would have to show that the fraud was enough to turn the tide.
[ad_2]
