[ad_1]
Thus, Lebanon is moving from the Maronites to the Sunni Maronites, to the Doha Agreement, which established a political tripartite between Maronites, Shiites and Sunnis. This last equation hit his mother on the head due to a shift in the balance of power in the region and Lebanon, until Hezbollah became an internal and regional team with a weight greater than the size of the internal Lebanese forces combined. . In the region, it has strong alliances that have been able to defeat US influence at more than one important juncture in the centers of the Yemeni-Syrian-Iraqi conflict.
As for the Lebanese, Hezbollah managed to defeat the occupying entity twice, in 2000 and 2006, inflicting a great loss on the terrorist project supported by the United States, the Gulf and Turkey. Questioning this support was rejected by former Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim, who admitted in a recent interview with the BBC that the Gulf financed terrorism in Syria with $ 169 billion at the American request, revealing that Lebanese politicians also they received about $ 60 million. Support the movement of terrorists to Syria from the Lebanese border.
This is not a coincidence, as it fully reflects the alliance of these future Lebanese forces Hariri and Punishment of Saqr, the former MP who managed the smuggling of “Islamists” into Syria from his office in Turkey, and the Socialist Party that was organizing his residence on Mount Lebanon, and also his transfer to Syria. Likewise, the sectarian forces in Mount Lebanon provided freedom of movement and support to the terrorist forces, through their regions in the north and Mount Lebanon.
These are not random accusations simply for offending the other, and skeptics should only go back to Hamad bin Jassim’s interview, which contains eloquent and clearer words. There, then, Ghaleb is Hezbollah and its alliances, and there is a defeated influence between the United States, the Gulf and Israel regionally, and the March 14 coalition internally. Do not these new equilibria result in a political equation to balance them? This is what international political logic says, but Lebanon has its own peculiarities that prevent the complete majority of political exclusion, and put an alternative, an additional role for the victor, but at the heart of the existing sectarian system. In conclusion, it is clear that the game of change in Lebanon has a degree of being closed by the fence of sectarianism and by the influence of external roles. Isn’t this what is happening in Lebanon?
Whoever listens to the commander of the “forces” Samir Geagea, feels that in the court of Alexander the Great or Napoleon Bonaparte, they are dictating their terms to the defeated. The followers of Walid Jumblatt are almost certain to applaud Socrates and Plato, before discovering that they are before a new “Musaylama.” As for the former prime minister, Saad Hariri, he speaks in a way in which his followers are deluded that he has over a billion Muslims willing to redeem political freedom with their lives, not with their money stolen for this political freedom. and its alliances in Lebanon, the Gulf, the Arab and Islamic world and the diaspora.
On the other hand, this March 14 coalition rollback does not fill the March 8 team with useful political proposals for the Lebanese, as there is similarity in their belief in sectarian political solutions, quotas, and as much corruption as possible in all its types.
The March 14 coalition withdrawal is not filled by the March 8 team with political proposals that are beneficial to the Lebanese, as there is a similarity in their belief in sectarian political solutions and quotas.
The scene seems very strange to those who are ignorant of how politics is handled in Lebanon, and it is unusual for those involved in it. All these forces, on both sides, are working in the service of amplifying their sectarian forces, withdrawing any role of reason in exchange for unleashing sectarian instincts, utilizing the role of “religious institutions and religious education” and controlling public money and employment. in the state administrations and the sectarian means of mobilization. There is, therefore, a deep harmony between the March 8 and 14 movements, but what prevents them from producing a highly sectarian and sectarian form of government, as usual, is the regional and international abroad. This exterior is involved in major conflicts throughout the Arab East, and perhaps the Middle East. But the Americans refuse to admit defeat, trying to adjust the balances with new conflict mechanisms, one of which is the exploitation of the economic collapse in Lebanon, to block Hezbollah as it is the spearhead of the resistance. and the victorious model that can be imitated.
This is what prompts the Americans, in this difficult Lebanese phase, to practice all kinds of blackmail, making sure that the party does not agree to starve Lebanese or the collapse of Lebanon.
They work directly at times, and again through the French, to impose their political demands related to the exchange of Lebanese oil wells with the Israeli entity, the closure of border crossings with Syria and the expansion of the tasks of the emergency forces. on the southern borders to reach its influence at a depth of about seventy kilometers inside Lebanon, thus becoming the weapon of Hezbollah. Surrounded by the Litani river by UNIFIL, and with Syria, closing the crossings.
This is what leads to postpone the formation of the government by external decision until further notice, despite the fact that all Lebanese political forces agree to the continuation of the sectarian system, the sectarian quota system in the presidencies of the Republic, the government and Parliament, and the administrative allocation and distribution of public money, which means an extension of sectarianism, perhaps for another century.
So where is the problem? The Maronite Patriarchate believes that the growing Shiite influence in the region and the increasing influence of Hezbollah at home are some of the reasons leading to a three-powerful Lebanese state, made up of Christians, Sunnis and Shiites, but with a Shiite leadership. basic, as was the role of the Maronites between 1948-1985. This conclusion is reached by a large Sunni group that, in turn, considers the need to restrict Hezbollah for regional reasons related to the Saudi-Iranian conflict, and internal Lebanese to the increase of the party’s power in the state and society. This is what led Patriarch Bechara Al-Rai to propose the concept of Lebanese neutrality between the conflicting powers in the Arab world, “Syria and the Gulf”, and regionally Saudi Arabia – Iran and Israel, and internationally, the United States, Iran and Russia. He also encouraged Sunni forces to accuse Hezbollah of bombing the port of Beirut and the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.
The question here is how to justify the Patriarch, and then the Sunnis, by forming a new government that unites them to Hezbollah. Or put the ministers on your committee alongside those who accuse them of breaking neutrality and destroying the miraculous Lebanese formula?
What can be concluded is, firstly, that it refers to the only sectarian option for all Lebanese political forces, without exception and without hope of a mental stage to abolish sectarianism. This means that the sectarian interior and the exterior it covers are working in a government that will only do so to reproduce ugly sectarian corruption. One of its first functions is to stop Lebanese society and prevent a real integration of its citizens. The strange thing is that the tasks of the constitutions in the world are to administer the state in a way that leads to the integration of the people within the framework of a unified national belonging. Lebanon is almost alone in its kind, in terms of preventing the integration of its people, by force of the constitution, which is divided between members of sects and not between citizens. Here it is possible to add tribal systems that produce kingdoms and emirates that distinguish citizens based on their tribal and regional differences.
However, it remains, despite its backwardness, better than the Lebanese sectarian system that the congregation of Cardinal HG Bechara Al-Rahi calls in eastern Switzerland, although it can be effectively classified as a medieval system that its status prevents developing towards the concept of a modern state with cover from the outside laying siege to the Lebanese in rotten historical basements.
* college professor
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
