“Political and media assassination” … “Strong Lebanon” denounces “militia” practices

The “Strong Lebanon” bloc energetically denounced what it described as the “militias and provocative practices” witnessed in the vicinity of the headquarters of the Free Patriotic Movement in Mirna Al-Shalouhi in Sin El-Fil, considering that they are “inseparable from the path of political and media assassinations followed by Lebanese forces against the movement “. Two years ago”.

In a statement issued after its periodic meeting, which was held electronically and headed by its president, Representative Gebran Bassil, highlighted “the need to leave the course of action and reaction” and called for “a commitment to the right to difference. and political competition under the roof of democracy and respect for the other opinion. ” On these principles and their results, and adhering to an immediate return to these principles as “one of the rights of our society and our people against us.”
On the other hand, the bloc affirmed its adherence to the French initiative, its support and its desire to make it successful, and to keep it away from any external or internal dispute to avoid its failure and protect the objective that was proposed to it, which is to achieve the reforms. Necessary and urgent to ensure a safe and gradual exit for Lebanon from the pressing financial and economic crisis.
Emphasizing facilitating the formation process, the bloc appreciated the decision of the President of the Republic to activate the government formation process in a way that ensures the necessary political and parliamentary support and ensures that the government obtains the required trust from Parliament, This could make it easier for the President-designate Mustafa Adib to carry out the necessary and necessary consultation with the parliamentary blocs to form a government capable of carrying out the reform tasks.
With the refusal of the bloc to dedicate any ministry to any sect or political party, it renewed its “rejection of any harassment abroad on any internal component with the aim of forming a government in a manner contrary to norms and principles.” And when expressing his “fear of continuing to waste time avoiding following the principles necessary to ensure the formation of the government,” he warned that “this issue exposes the country to greater political division and economic deterioration at a time when understanding can be adopted. internal that meets its conditions to remove the government formation capable of implementing the program. ” The reformer agreed. “