No change or amendment in the Falanges negotiating delegation



[ad_1]

The border demarcation negotiations did not begin in practice yesterday, since the first session was formal, but it will practically begin in a session scheduled for October 26, where an in-depth discussion will take place.

Sources close to the Baabda Palace confirm to the Al-Jumhuriya newspaper that President Michel Aoun has no intention of reconstituting the negotiating delegation. Recalling that “Aoun’s words were clear when he gave his instructions to the members of the delegation that the negotiation is technical to demarcate maritime borders.” He clarifies that “the presence of an expert in international law and maritime border demarcation, who is Christian Najib, is necessary because negotiations on maritime demarcation are being carried out. Likewise, the presence of the head of the Oil Sector Authority and the February Medal is necessary because the investigation after the demarcation of the maritime line that separates Lebanon from the occupied territories will in practice include the issue of the marine fields that are assumes that they store oil and gas, as well as the negotiation and investigation of the Lebanese side, and that the commission is concerned about this issue as She is the one who conducted studies on the conditions of Lebanese waters and the materials they store, and followed the theme of exploration and prospecting companies. On this basis, the oil fields were distributed and fields 8 and 9 were identified adjacent to the fields on the occupied lands. Accordingly, there must be an expert on this topic, since the military, regardless of the size of their knowledge, is not so much the involvement of specialists.

The same sources indicate that Christian and Shabat are included in the delegation, and they participate in the negotiation sessions as two technical experts and not to carry out any other investigation or to “normalize”, explaining that “the head of the delegation, the general of Yassin brigade is the one who negotiates, while the rest of the members are there to help you if you need any technical consultation. ” In the negotiation sessions ». As for the session itself, then the presence of experts is required, according to Aoun, in case there is any confusion or need for some investigation or clarification, and that “civilians are not present to normalize or recognize Israel, but to help the military delegation, and they are specialists and technicians in turn and have no political status for them. ” .

And on the grounds that the participation of two technical experts in the negotiations to help the military does not justify this systematic objection, some see in this campaign against the President of the Republic mere “formalities” of the “Shiite duo”, specifically of ” Hezbollah “, after the criticism that they have directed for negotiating with the Israeli enemy, Or that several parties consider that after these negotiations their weapons will not make sense. While there may be narrow political interests behind the campaign related to internal files and letters exchanged between Mar Mikhael’s allies, or a message to the US mediator in the “party” demarcation negotiations stating that “demarcation is under our consideration and according to our will and there is no room for any form of normalization or profit for President Donald to approve. ” Trump before the next major elections at our expense, and the political negotiation is only with Iran, “according to political sources.

According to sources close to Aoun, “this type of campaign weakens the Lebanese position.” And she asks: “Is there an interest in weakening the Lebanese position in these difficult situations in which we go through and risk and negotiate with an Israeli enemy who is always ready to gnaw on our land and water?” And he indirectly responds to the attempt to target Aoun by saying: “Talking about the delegation damages the course of the negotiations more than it hurts.” To the people, and the delegation gets tired and puts a lot of weight on this national issue ”. And she asks: “Is it wise to open doors like this at a time when the only door that needs to be opened is the one that leads to positive results, and that is demarcation?”

Source: The Republic



[ad_2]