New details about the decision issued against the husband of Nancy Ajram … this is what the deceased planned



[ad_1]

Radwan Mortada wrote in Al-Akhbar: Since 2019, Muhammad al-Musa, who was killed by bullets fired by Dr. Fadi Al-Hashem, the husband of artist Nancy Ajram, was conspiring to rob the homes of famous people, after having been locked for more than five months. That he was “borrowing the price of his food.” This is what the facts of the indictment issued by the first investigating judge in Monte Líbano, Nicolas Mansour, yesterday against the defendant Al-Hashem revealed, indicating that an analysis of the phone of the victim and his wife showed that he had carried out a search on Google about Ajram and actresses Najwa Karam, Haifa Wehbe and Myriam Klink and their home locations and investigated. His news and asked them about their houses, their divisions and their phone numbers, considering that he planned to rob the economically well-off. When Ajram was chosen, al-Mousa explored his home and surroundings.

The prosecution revealed that Al-Hashem did not know Al-Musa, as claimed by the wife of the murder victim. He explained that the wife relied on her husband’s statements the night he was killed, when he told her that he was going to collect the money that someone owed him. She informed interrogators that her husband was not in her nature that night, and that she returned after leaving to take a pistol-shaped lighter.

The prosecution listed the details of the crime, according to what the surveillance cameras at Ajram and Al-Hashem’s home showed. The defendant cited the details of the night his home was raided by a masked man carrying a weapon who threatened him and asked him to give him the gold. In response to the investigating judge’s question about the reason for the firing of more than 17 bullets in Al-Mousa, more than 14 of them penetrating his body, Al-Hashem replied that he was not aware when he learned that the person masked she went to her children’s room. Note that you changed the comb on your weapon before firing again..

The investigating judge considered the act of the accused as a crime of intentional homicide provided for in article 547, which requires imprisonment for a period of 15 years, but sympathized with article 228, second paragraph of the Penal Code, that is, a request for mitigation because of having been killed in self-defense. And your home. Despite this, he was not prevented from being tried, but rather requested that he be tried before the Baabda Criminal Court, which will have the last word.

Source: News

[ad_2]