[ad_1]
Image posted, REUTERS
Adeeb highlighted, while apologizing for the formation of the government, the total lack of consensus among the affected political parties.
Arab newspapers and websites have discussed Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Mustafa Adeeb’s announcement of his apology for forming the government, amid the current political crisis in Lebanon.
Diab had indicated in a televised speech after a meeting with Lebanese President Michel Aoun that his apology was produced for the failure to comply with the conditions of the political blocs not to “politicize” the formation, underlining that “the consensus no longer exists.”
While one book believed that sectarianism in Lebanon was stronger than the French initiative, others accused Hezbollah of thwarting the formation of the French government and initiative.
Wafa Awad says in the Emirati newspaper Al Bayan that Adeeb “arose in his face with many obstacles, the most prominent of which was the double knot of ‘Amal and Hezbollah’ sticking to the money bag. His ministers, Adib preferred to apologize Instead of running in a vicious circle, he didn’t have his keys.
The writer added: “There was no internal party capable of breaking the wall of the government’s impasse, while France, godfather of the start-up and authorship process, emptied its proposals and exits before discovering that what is happening in Lebanon does not it is a question of forming a government. ” Rather, he “demarcated” the limits of the powers of the sects and sects, thus keeping his initiative immobile on the pavement of authorship.
Under the headline “Adeeb Retires and Lebanon Into the Unknown”, Rawya Hashemi said in the Saudi newspaper Okaz: “Adeeb apologized to the Lebanese people and emphasized that the initiative of French President Emmanuel Macron must continue because it expresses the sincere intention of France. . And they began to launch accusations and hold them accountable. “
‘External interference’
In the London-based newspaper Rai Al-Youm, Abdel Bari Atwan believes that Adib’s apology for forming the Lebanese government confirms that “sectarianism is stronger than the French initiative that came with this government.”
Atwan believes that “the conflict on Lebanese soil was and continues to be an Iranian, Franco-American”, adding that “stability is prohibited in Lebanon, by an American decision, and the only thing that is allowed is civil war and internal fighting, or submission to its conditions completely. That is, the issue is not a matter of dispute by a ministry. ” Financial, or allowing the blocs to appoint their ministers, the issue is a matter of external interference through local tools, which want the tension to continue until the fate of an entire region is resolved ”.
Image posted, REUTERS
Arab writers say Adeeb apologized for forming the government because of Hezbollah’s position
The role of Iran and Hezbollah
In the London newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, Iyad Abu Shakra refers to what he described as “Tehran conditions” in Lebanon.
It says: “In Lebanon, where Tehran is almost completely in control of security and the political game, the Iranian defiance failed a high-level French intervention and delayed progress towards a staggered political coexistence formula.”
He continues: “The interesting thing here is that the aforementioned formula may eventually lead to a founding conference. This is the station from which Iran Street and its sectarian milieu in Lebanon hope to head towards circumventing the Taif Agreement and go – too. gradually – towards a Shiite triangle – A Sunni-Christian, before which the disarmament of the Hezbollah militia is not a condition. Rather, the predominance of this weapon is established under her. “
In Bahrain Gulf News, Abdel Moneim Ibrahim criticizes the inability of Hezbollah and France to limit their role.
He says: “France will not change the terrible political situation there … Why? … Because France has not yet included the Lebanese Hezbollah in the list of terrorist entities, as many European countries have recently done.”
The writer went on to say that France “would present a traditional Lebanese government dominated by Hezbollah, in which the ruling political class would exchange financial and economic interests.”
“It seems that the calculations that impede the government formation process have become much more than a mere ministerial portfolio. Or it was, in the first place, while Adeeb explicitly expressed that Hezbollah is adopting a strategy of take and demand more.” It is the method used and known forever by the party, which it relies on to subdue its opponents and obtain more profits. After seizing the Finance Ministry, he began negotiating by appointing other Shiite ministers, and pressured his allies to demand the same.
