[ad_1]
Caroline Akoum wrote in the Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper:
Once again, the dispute between the two allies, the Progressive Socialist Party and the Future Movement, came to light in the context of the formation of a government and the quota system that has so far prevented its formation.
Despite the desire of the two parties, as usual, to keep the debate within certain limits, the statements of both parties reflect the existence of a difference in the approach to the path of government formation. Children. “Jumblatt said in a televised interview:” The children played in the fight between President Michel Aoun and President-designate Saad Hariri a farce, and I think the little we hear is that the obstruction between them is because they have not yet met. agreed on the names. “Noting that” Aoun and his team took the interior, the energy, the defense and the justice, almost all the joints of the state, and the Shiite duo took the money and something else, and I don’t know what the others part is! “
This criticism was answered by Hariri’s adviser, former MP Mustafa Alloush, who described Jumblatt as “the king of quotas.” He wrote on his Twitter account: “When the king of quotas criticizes quotas. I vaguely read the words of leader Jumblatt from the Saad Hariri quota channel. ” He added: “ The strange thing about the leader is that he knows who is looking for a quota, and he knows that Hariri is targeting an important government that stops the collapse and outside the logic of quotas that the leader is used to. ” Or did you get a signal from a planet? ”. Aloush sees the difference as a passing cloud linked to unmet demand from Jumblatt.
For his part, the socialist deputy Bilal Abdullah affirms that Jumblatt’s message to Hariri is not personal, nor does it arise from an obsession with quotas, but is linked to the fear of departing from the framework of the French initiative and returning to the previous dichotomy . Abdullah told Al-Sharq al-Awsat: “What Jumblatt said is related to the problem of being distracted by forming within the high ceilings the demands of the parties and the race for the obstructing third party, while Lebanon is buried without any concern”. Some parties are taking Lebanon hostage to the US-Iran conflict, leading Hariri to lose his balance day after day, to hold him accountable for what will happen in Lebanon, and wash their hands.
While Abdullah cautions against repeating the “duality” between Hariri and MP Gebran Bassil through a new duality between Hariri, Aoun and Bassil’s successor, he says: “It is not allowed to deal with Walid Jumblatt in this way” and confirms that he did not offer the “democratic meeting” anything related to the government. “At a time when those who did not name Hariri impose their terms of writing. The information indicates that a team wants to control the country by obtaining the most prominent security ministries ”, referring to an agreement on obtaining the President of the Republic from the Ministries of Defense, Interior and Justice.
On the other hand, Alloush said in a statement to Asharq Al-Awsat: “Jumblatt always likes to be spoiled, and Hariri has already made his decision to form the government away from quotas.” And he adds: “Consequently, Jumblatt’s comments are always out of logic or in pursuit of specific interests, although not A disagreement on questions of principle, and therefore the difference is but a cloud and will pass between the Two parts.
Regarding the information that indicated that Hariri made a promise to Jumblatt with certain ministries, Alloush said: “I am not aware of this matter”, asking, based on Jumblatt’s words: “Is the Ministry of Foreign Relations not balanced? Or does everyone want service ministries now, while funds are absent and unavailable?
[ad_2]
