Macron threw a fireball … and this is arranged for him

The French, and according to diplomatic sources familiar with French airspace for the “Republic,” claim that “French President Emmanuel Macron diagnosed the reality in Lebanon as it is, and that the Lebanese were all partners in the failure of his initiative. , and he considered this a betrayal of the Lebanese people’s right to be rescued from collapse and a personal insult. ” Especially for him, especially since he had previously informed the political leaders in Lebanon in Qasr al-Pine, that he puts all his credit and political future as a bet for the success of his initiative, and on the other hand he considered it a direct association or indirectly between them, to keep the crisis in place to cover up what they had committed against their country. He kept his promise, which he had previously made in Lebanon, that he will tell the Lebanese and the international community to embrace his initiative the names of the unemployed.

According to the same diplomatic sources, “Macron would not have held a press conference and contributed unknown words, phrases and vocabulary of this sharpness and cruelty against the political class in Lebanon. A French president rarely used them before him, had he not come to the conviction that Lebanon’s political leaders erected a wall in front of his initiative. And that the flexibility he showed during his two visits to Lebanon, and the efforts he made personally to form the French initiative government, were limited to pushing the fixed Lebanese train in place, forward, due to the obstacles that the Lebanese put it on. They got in the way, so it was necessary to replace the carrot that he had been carrying since then. Last August with a stick, and he struck this wall in the way he adopted it, as an expression of the degree of discontent he felt over the deliberate failure of his initiative to save Lebanon. However, Macron did not close the door on the Lebanese leaders, but gave the unemployed a few weeks, as a last chance to change their behavior, and choose between putting his country on the path of advance or the path of explosion. ”.