[ad_1]
9 hours ago
Beirut – “Al-Quds Al-Arabi”: After criticism from some, especially the political body of the “Free Patriotic Movement” and in circles in the revolution of October 17, for the Sunni political and spiritual references for their belated embrace of the head of the interim government, Hassan Diab, as a Refusal to damage the position of prime minister, the “Block of the Future” issued a remarkable statement that led many political Messages in the direction of more than one party, and criticized how “defenders of all sides and political and sectarian directions called in defense of justice and the judiciary, only because the national leaders and the national religious authority resorted to the warning against insulting the position of the prime minister, and the accusation against the current prime minister in the case of the criminal bomb. Beirut port and its surrounding population.
The bloc considered that “some of those who care about the rights of the victims and the afflicted have accused Beirut of being the victim with all its sectarian and sectarian components. Justice and Law ”, noting that“ these references were raised by a suspicious path, difficult to isolate from political malice and from the continuous attempts to overthrow the formula of national consensus and the successive calls to impose sectarian standards on the country’s political administration ”.
Referring to President Michel Aoun’s team, the bloc said: “Yes, there is a plan that we will not allow to pass, neither by the judiciary nor by anything else, to target the post of prime minister. A retaliation plan for the Taif Agreement, which achieved an effective participation in power and ended a period of monopolization and exclusivity in the management of its institutions. A plan that evokes the coup literature of the late eighties, to impose it on political and national life more than thirty years after its fall.“. And he said: “There is a plan to contain and isolate the first site of the Sunni community in Lebanon, either through intimidation against the prime minister and the accusations against him in the case of the port, or through intimidation against the authorities. policies that were taken over by the prime minister for the past ten years, and the House of Representatives deposited a book that lists the former heads of government on the list of those responsible for the port explosion.
And they confirmed “They allow themselves the right to defend their sites, sects, works and components, and they also allow themselves to upset the country for years and years, without worrying about material losses and vital and economic repercussions to ensure access to the strongest of their sect for president. And they have the right to suspend the formation of governments, as a proposal in the eyes of the brother-in-law, or under the guise of imposing standards that allow sectarian leaders to appoint ministers, elect ministerial portfolios and adhere to the obstructing third party, even if the standards are so. they force to bite the actions of other sects. They do not take long to gather supporters in front of the entrances to the Republican Palace to protect the presidential office, and to mark red lines before the popular movements and the peaceful objection to the superior policies of the State..
The Future bloc indicated that “the series of exclusive rights of the leaders, leaders and presidencies of sects to defend their positions is permissible for everyone without exception, whether in front of the judiciary, or in violation of the law, or in the heresy of the constitution, or in transgressing the limits of authority, or in covering up interference. Al-Askari in foreign wars, ending with the suspension of appointments of the fourth category to successful civil service and unleashing religious jealousy to protect this governor or that employee.
She added: “This is all metaphorical, legitimate, legal and patriotic, and does not fall into the category of sectarian and sectarian mobilization … One thing has provoked those who care about justice and the judiciary, and temple merchants. who dominate the trade with pain. Citizens run for the destruction of Beirut and the pains of its people and residents, to score political points against this or that group. One thing they placed in the category of sectarian protection and pushed the boundaries of the judiciary is defending the position of prime minister, who took the accusation against him as an opportunity to shoot various government authorities. Their houses are all broken glass and the sectarian flags on all the roofs, but they are not like the smashed, beaten and overburdened houses and roofs of Beirut.
He continued: “If that were the case, they would have stopped obstructing the formation of the government and would have accepted the formation of the president-designate who rises above the party quota system and runs to save Beirut from the clutches of destruction and destruction. devastation, and they would not have entrenched themselves behind sectarian and partisan quotas to block the roads to rebuild Beirut and support its people. “
She concluded: “We are the victims in Beirut. We are the relatives of the victims and the guardians of the blood, and we do not accept any offer from anyone, and we were and are heads of government, deputies and spiritual references, at the forefront of those who demand justice and punishment for negligence, guilt, knowledge and commotion from the top of the pyramid to the bottom, but not on the basis of fragmentary political and discretionary justice. .
