[ad_1]
Lebanese Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah accused Lebanon’s former prime ministers of trying to use the French initiative to score political points. He criticized what he described as the “arrogant” behavior of French President Emmanuel Macron and his behavior as the ruler and guardian of Lebanon, as he himself put it.
Nasrallah said Tuesday that what was required of the French initiative to resolve the Lebanese crisis was the handover of Lebanon to what he described as the club of former prime ministers. The Hezbollah Secretary General considered that whoever benefited from the French initiative to achieve political gains was the one who caused its failure.
The Hezbollah secretary general also refused to accuse Macron of the Lebanese political class of “treason” after his failure to form a government, despite his promise to form one within two weeks.
Nasrallah’s remarks came in a speech broadcast by his party’s Al-Manar TV on Tuesday night, two days after the French president accused political forces in Lebanon that they had failed to fulfill their obligation to facilitate the Government formation to commit “collective treason”, giving them a period of “4 to 6 weeks” to form a government. “With a specific mission” he gets international support.
Despite harsh criticism directed at Macron, who has been putting great pressure on the political class since the port explosion, Nasrallah confirmed his support for the French initiative, calling at the same time to “reconsider” the way of working.
But he also stressed that this welcome does not mean the approval of any government, nor that the French president acts as “prosecutor, investigator, judge, issuer of sentences, trustee, ruler and governor of Lebanon.”
Commenting on Macron’s comments on Sunday, Nasrallah added: “We do not accept being accused of treason … We reject and condemn this arrogant behavior against us and all political forces,” adding: “We do not accept this language or this. method”.
The Hezbollah Secretary General described the pressure on the apology of Prime Minister-designate Mustafa Adeeb as an “affront to national dignity”, but at the same time said: “We wish this initiative to be successful and we support that it be complete and we are betting on it as everyone is betting, but I ask for a reconsideration. For the method and the fact … and also in the language of communication “.
The first square
Mustafa Adeeb’s apology on Saturday for not forming a new government returned the political situation in Lebanon, which is mainly mired in its crises, especially the economic one, to the starting point. Their efforts specifically collided with conditions imposed by Hezbollah and its ally Amal Movement, led by Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, for their commitment to appoint Shiite ministers and keep the money bag.
However, Nasrallah refused to have set conditions that would hinder the authorship efforts. The former heads of government accused the Sunnis who appointed Adeeb to head the government of trying to impose a “de facto government”, with their insistence on forming a mini-government of 14 ministers, imposing portfolio rotation, appointing all ministers and distribute the portfolios, in an attempt to change the “norms” that are followed in the formation of governments.
He explained that the French newspaper that political forces agreed upon during Macron’s recent visit to Beirut did not include all of this.
Nasrallah highlighted the importance of Hezbollah’s involvement in the government. He said: “We must be in government, through partisanship or non-partisanship, this is negotiable, to protect the back of the resistance.”
Lebanese President Michel Aoun has not set a date for the binding parliamentary consultations he must hold to assign a new figure to form a government.
Often in Lebanon, a country based on the logic of agreements and quotas, these consultations are formal and preceded by consensus among the major powers on the name of the designated prime minister prior to his official nomination, and himself This principle applies to the composition of the government that he establishes.
[ad_2]
