[ad_1]
Faten Al-Hajj wrote in “Al-Akhbar”: The strike by the executive body of the Association of Full-Time Teachers at the Lebanese University for two consecutive days left mixed reactions among teachers. Some supported the move now, that is, at the beginning of the school year, as one of the ways to reincorporate the rights of teachers on the agenda of the Council of Ministers, and because the open strike is one of the main pressure options to fix the files so that the hiring teachers are emptied and the entry of the full-time teachers to the owners. And some of them did not count on the strike, in terms of timeliness and effectiveness, since most of the universities have not yet begun to study and teaching in the first semester will be remote.
Likewise, the measure “took place in the context of reaction and not action”, since the League expected, according to educational sources, the issuance of two entry decrees for the two ministers, Hamad Hassan and Lama Yammine, owners of the university to demand the entrance of more than 50 professors who retired before the entrance of the owners and were denied pension and health coverage, while no precise data was collected on the files of these professors. “Sources indicated that “There were two stations that required action: the first was last year when they retired, and the second when retired professor Ali Al-Mooush died in the Corona pandemic, and contract professor Vasily Boogie was unavailable.” His sources expressed their fear of employing the movement in the League elections that are just around the corner, while the university must not only address the rights of the people, but make it an issue of public opinion. a as well as corruption, the judiciary and hospitalization. “The League and groups of professors failed in this in the strike of 2018. And in the uprising of October 17,” mainly because the sectarian balance and the political disputes obstruct all the archives of the university.
Read the full article Press here.
Source: News
