[ad_1]
A committee of human rights experts working for the United Nations claimed that the arrest of Carlos Ghosn, former head of the “Renault-Nissan” alliance, was arbitrary and demanded that the Japanese government pay him “material compensation” in addition to “other forms. of compensation”.
A committee of human rights experts working for the United Nations claimed that the arrest of Carlos Ghosn, former head of the “Renault-Nissan” alliance, was arbitrary and demanded that the Japanese government pay him “material compensation” in addition to “other forms. of compensation”.
Jamie Kitten of the Associated Press reported that the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded, in an opinion published Monday, that Ghosn’s detention in Japan in late 2018 and early 2019 was “arbitrary” and asked the Japanese government ” to take the necessary steps to address Mr. Ghosn without delay. “
The team, made up of four independent experts, called on Japan to carry out a “full and independent investigation” into Ghosn’s arrest and called on the government to “take appropriate action against those responsible for violating his rights.”
The 17-page opinion reads: “In light of all the circumstances of the case, the working group considers that an appropriate measure to remedy the situation is to grant Mr. Ghosn an enforceable right to obtain material and other compensation, from conformity with international law ”.
Ghosn, 66, was arrested in November 2018 on charges of breach of trust, misuse of company assets for personal gain and violating securities laws by not fully disclosing his compensation and fees. Ghosn denied the charges against him, accusing “Nissan” and Japanese officials of conspiring to bring him down in order to prevent the merger between Nissan and its French partner Renault from being completed. Last December, Ghosn fled Japan for Lebanon while under house arrest awaiting trial.
It should be noted that the opinions issued by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention are not binding on the States, but rather have the objective of holding the States accountable for the fulfillment of their human rights obligations. The task force had previously expressed its opinion on the case of Julian Assange, founder of “WikiLeaks”, saying that Assange’s rights had been violated.
Ghosn’s lawyers had submitted a petition to the United Nations working group in March 2019, asking it to play its role in hearing cases in which governments are pointed the guilty finger for arbitrarily detaining people in contravention. of international agreements on human rights.
The UN Human Rights Office cited members of the task force who refused to speak to journalists about their views.
[ad_2]
