[ad_1]
Israeli sources confirmed that negotiations with Lebanon on the demarcation of maritime borders and the rights of the two countries in economic waters are facing difficulties. Because it showed that there is a big gap more than expected. He said the Lebanese accuse the Israeli side of trying to control as much of the water economic zone as possible and seize its natural resources, and see the Israeli proposals as a provocation.
These sources spoke to the right-wing newspaper “Israel Hayom”, detailing the differences. He said that Lebanon proposed during the last round of negotiations that the economic water dividing line be south of the line that was deposited by its representatives before the United Nations in 2010, claiming to expand its area in these waters, and get closer to the two gas fields . Israel took them, and called them “Karish” and “Leviathan”. The newspaper described the Lebanese position as “provocative”.
The newspaper, which is known for its proximity to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, added that the Israeli delegation responded by saying that Israeli Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz “authorized us to conduct negotiations in the area north of the Line. Green and not cross it. ” The “green line” is the economic watershed that Lebanon deposited with the United Nations in 2010. Israel demanded that Israel obtain an area in the economic waters north of the line it deposited with the United Nations in 2010, noting that the line deposited by Lebanon at that time, It was a straight line that went from the land limit between the two sides towards the sea, and represented the border of the territorial waters between the two sides.
The Israeli delegation stated that it was interested in negotiating the different triangle around it in the economic waters, which total 850 square kilometers, and that “if Lebanon shows extremist positions, then Israel can review them as well.
The newspaper reported that during Israeli deliberations leading up to the second round of negotiations, Steinitz revised two possible limits to economic waters “to constitute a provocation against the Lebanese provocation.” The first line is called the “black line”, which enters the Lebanese territorial waters, while the other line, the “red line”, occupies a large area of the Lebanese territorial waters and bypasses the marine area in front of the city. Lebanese of Tire. The newspaper added that Steinitz considered the “black line” to express a “moderate” Israeli position.
The newspaper quoted a senior Israeli official familiar with the details, stating that “it is possible to find decent justifications for Line 310 (that is, the ‘red line’), but the Minister of Energy ordered the delegation to review the line further. The Israeli official considered that “only if the two sides adopt a pragmatic approach, will it be possible to move towards the resolution of the dispute”, adding that “Israel will not discuss any border south of the Green Line that Lebanon reviewed in Nations United in 2010 “.
[ad_2]
