Israel bans a channel for evangelical “supporters”: why hostility?

About a week ago, the Hebrew-language channel “Lena” (Hebrew), launched on the local cable in Israel, was affiliated with the God Evangelical Evangelical (God TV) television network. The network, which broadcasts religious content in more than two hundred countries, was banned in Israel before it was released, although its director, Ward Simpson, stated that the goal of launching “Chilano” in Israel was “to preach the nation of Israel to Jesus. the Jew, “saying,” You will. The Jews hear the Bible presented in its original language … We have entered into a seven-year contract.

Simpson’s goals were thwarted by Israeli Communications Minister David Emsalem by banning the channel, and the reason, as the latter said on “Twitter”, is that “we will not allow any missionary channel to operate in Israel at any time and in any case”. The investigation … the last thing we want is to cause problems. “In the end, the Israeli” HOT “decided to” abide by the law “and that it would act” based on the results of the investigations opened by the Israeli broadcasting authority against Shilano, after an Orthodox Jewish association filed a complaint against him. “
Those responsible for the channel are evangelical evangelists, and these followers of the same religious belief as the evangelical priests who sat in the front row applauding President Donald Trump while patting the shoulder of his friend Benjamin Netanyahu at the time the White House announced the “Agreement of the century”. These also constitute an important electoral base for Trump (80% of whom voted for him in the elections) and enjoy wide influence in the United States, and dozens of societies they administer donate to Zionist religious organizations in occupied Palestine, as they encourage Israeli policies based on the doctrine of “divine settlement”. .
The content of the dogma established in strict Christianity states that there are “divine measures” that will be followed by “cosmic destruction”, which are specific events that evangelical evangelists interpret as “the beginning of the end of the world, the return of Christ to the building the Jewish synagogue in Jerusalem and restoring the State of Israel to the Jews. ” These incidents were evident to missionaries in moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and Washington’s recognition of the latter as “the capital of the State of Israel.” Here, the scene of American Pastor Robert Jeffers standing on the podium at the embassy opening ceremony two years ago was able to attend when he blessed the opening. Although Jefferson believes that “the Jews will only survive destruction by embracing Christianity,” the evangelists’ support for Israel cannot be interpreted as a defense of Judaism, but rather a loyalty to Israel’s policies which, in his opinion, as Part of a “divine agreement”, it leads to the end of the world and the coming of Christ.

For example, Ben Myon’s book “Knowledge” includes hostility and hatred against Christians.

All of this is in the palm of one hand, and the hostility that classical Judaism (orthodox and current tribalism, which is its direct extension) towards Christians has in another hand. Banning the canal may be an important occasion to remember the roots of this hostility, although it may seem difficult when Judaism is spoken of as the religion of its separation from Zionism (which materialized in the attempt to return the Jews to a closed totalitarian society. ). The evidence, as the late Israeli researcher Yisrael Shahak explains, “There are political and strategic considerations that have affected the rulers of Israel. However, the actual policies practiced by these people were a station in which realistic considerations and religious ideological influences interacted.
In his book, “Jewish History, Judaism: The Impact of Three Thousand Years,” Shahak recalls the late Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion’s speech in the Knesset on the day of the “Suez War,” when he said, “This war is to return the Kingdom of David and Solomon to their biblical borders. ” Note that Ben-Gurion was an atheist and scoffed at the teachings of Judaism. The researcher returns to remind him that “because religious ideological influences are evident and recognized (for the West), they are generally ignored or focussed on discriminatory policies against non-Jews (in occupied Palestine and elsewhere) ” He then justifies adding that the West (especially the United States) supports Israel, not only because of the intersection of strategic interests, but “a deceptive operation practiced against them.”
how that? The writer says: “After the occupation of Palestine and the rabbis feeling safe, these people practiced a complex deceptive process directed at the West and its societies. In translated versions of the Torah and Talmudic literature, hostile expressions against Christians are replaced by attenuated words or words inspired by the Yiddish language, but they do not mean a clear and specific meaning for the western reader. For example, the book “Knowledge” (from Talmudic Literature), by Rav Moshi Bin Maimon, includes vocabulary like “Jesus of Nazareth and his disciples must be exterminated”. Translated into English, “extermination and deletion” was replaced by “must be dealt with firmly”.
In the general picture, Judaism harbors a clear hostility towards all (non-Jews), especially Christians, because it believes that “the people of the Jews do not matter from their existence, except the service to the Jews”, and the uncompromising even today they burn all the versions of the “Bible” that come into their hands. Hundreds of similar behaviors that are practiced as part of religious worship can be found, of which Shahak spoke, documented by dozens of sources and evidence in his book published in 1984. Although these are not hidden matters but published decades ago, the subject prohibiting proselytizing in Israel may be a point to remember this.