[ad_1]
Mobile security incidents, from the port explosion to the Ain Qana accident in the south to terrorist operations in the north, have raised a wave of questions about their timeline and targeted areas and their link to other terrorist operations. especially the clashes that took place over the weekend in Wadi Khaled and its relation to the terrorist crime in Kuftun and the cell movement. Sleeper in Lebanon by third parties. Political circles placed the monitoring of what happened in Wadi Khaled in the most dangerous circle, wondering where the terrorist militants came from and how they stationed themselves in the house without being discovered. Do you have assistants and informants? Why were they not previously monitored by the security services? Isn’t he supposed to conduct a security study of the region, control the borders with Syria and demarcate them to preserve the interests of the two countries, as President Michel Suleiman told his Syrian counterpart at the Syrian summit in August 2008 ?
Likewise, Western diplomatic circles stopped before the explosion of the Qana and Wadi Khaled incidents and classified them in the same safe, considering that Lebanon has been exposed to security, especially since the inhabitants of the nearby mountainous areas To the Syrian border they monitor night air traffic and marches flying over the south, the mountain and the mountain, until they reach the Bekaa. So is the politically tense situation being exploited to cover other issues and convey certain messages, or are outside parties moving terrorist cells with a purpose within Yaqoub’s soul, and what are the dimensions of what happened and Lebanon has seen exposed to security?
Brigadier General Khaled Hamada told Al-Markaziyah: “Between the bombings in the port of Beirut and the terrorist incidents taking place in northern Lebanon, there are two directions, the bombings in the port and the attacks of Ain Qana, which are titled uncontrolled weapons and the absence of the state in Lebanon and the exacerbation of the Iranian project and the capture of Lebanon in this regional axis. As for the terrorist incidents, their title is the political vacuum that opens the way to the security vacuum and exposes the stability in Lebanon to vibration. This is an attempt that reminds us of what happened before the events of Nahr al-Bared in northern Lebanon when the Syrian regime and Hezbollah tried to re-establish priorities and bring national security in Lebanon to a state of instability. of words with other files, and this is what we live today.
He added: “ Going back to the bombing of the port and Ain Qana, everyone has realized that the Hezbollah warehouses scattered throughout Lebanon among the citizens and in vital facilities, and this is what the bombing of the port of Beirut showed , expresses the exacerbation of Iranian oppression in Lebanon and the sinking of its alliances with Hezbollah in this alliance. Whoever exposed Lebanon to a confrontation with the international community, exposed it to a confrontation with the Arab community ”.
Hamada continued: “Today all the ammunition depots in Lebanon have been turned into time bombs that are present among the citizens and are subject to bombing operations from within, and we mean intelligence operations or subject to attacks from the Israeli enemy. inside Lebanon. Hezbollah has left its project that called for the liberation of Lebanon and resistance against the Israeli enemy. Since 2000, and specifically after the 2006 aggression, this project has become a project that manipulated national security and tried to change the political equations in his favor, and this became evident when he stood up to the French initiative and insisted on achievements not recognized by the constitution and joined some sects to some sites to say that this phase cannot be passed what that was allowed. In it, Hezbollah is the state without achieving the political achievements that are recorded for the future. The third firm and the Ministry of Finance s and the talk about the pact of a claim is nothing more than an attempt to translate the strength of Hezbollah and the power of illegal weapons and its control over the pact through the presidential elections and through the recent electoral law to say that it has taken over the state and wants to translate these achievements into political achievements that consolidate its hegemony over Lebanon. .
And he said: “As for the terrorist attacks, it is very clear today, the international crisis that the government in Lebanon and the electricity system are experiencing due to its corruption, as well as its alliance with illegal weapons and giving it the leading role in the protection of Lebanon from the Lebanese army and the security services. We all mention the statements of the President of the Republic in more than one place. And more than one Arab capital in this matter. Today, to attract international attention and attention, and to push all internal effort and internal concerns towards other priorities that differ from the priorities of political stability and the formation of an internationally trustworthy government, and to allow Lebanon to overcome the crisis economic, enemies of Lebanon and those who bet on instability, especially Hezbollah and the Syrian regime, and all beneficiaries, lead us to establish security priorities. On top of the Lebanese concerns and the depletion of state capabilities or what remains of its security capabilities in this archive, what is happening in the north today reminds us of what happened before the Nahr al -Bared, and those sporadic security incidents from Ain Alaq to Tripoli to Koura, acts of theft that later escalated into terrorist acts and led to the clashes that led him to Nahr Al-Bared. The Hezbollah-led political team and the regional team investing in the instability of the Lebanese are increasingly trying to capture Lebanon and place it on the Iranian-American negotiating table by making instability a priority in the face of international public opinion that calls for Lebanon to return to international and Arab legitimacy and for Lebanon to once again be at the forefront of the priority of security. Consequently, the discussion of political and economic reform, the abolition of the corruption system and the liberation of Lebanon from the regional axis, rather wants to lead us towards the hypothesis of saving Lebanon from the terrorism that is introduced from time to time and investing it in the process of establishing political positions and illegal weapons.
Hamada concluded: “I think we are in a very dangerous phase and we are open to many possibilities. Terrorist acts can be repeated, and this will place a burden on the security services to strengthen preventive security before it assumes the magnitude of the danger.” Likewise, hope is lost in this political power that continues to be mired in its political and financial corruption to the point that it will not be able to leave Lebanon towards an independent government and a government of specialists that is not accountable to this corrupt political environment to address donor countries and the International Monetary Fund to approve reforms and finance the Lebanese state.
[ad_2]
