[ad_1]
The scenario requires a careful reading of the development of political positions and alignments at the national level, based on what the Shiite demand for the money bag has produced.
Far from the deadly stateco showdown that is unshakable except for a miracle that frees Mustafa Adib’s government and lifts it out of the raging conflict between the Shiite duo and the Sunni quartet and those behind them, the scenario requires a careful reading of the development of political positions and alignments at the national level based on what has emerged from the Shiite demand for the money bag as custom. It is a sacred right that no one in Lebanon recognizes except bilateral, as long as it is not stipulated in the constitution or in any national document.
In all the stages and crises that the country has gone through since the end of the civil war, the political division has been vertical between the different forces in terms of visions on how to rebuild the state between the supporters of the Syrian regime and their opponents, and later between March 8 and 14, giving rise to the fragile political settlements that fell in the first real maturity. The dividing equation has changed today and now for the first time it is this: the Shiite duo, specifically Hezbollah, is in the middle of all political parties, including party allies, in the opposite direction. A renewed case, the details and dimensions of which must be carefully examined, informed political sources told Al Markaziyah. This team, which invested its internal alliances to the maximum and used them in the interest of its transnational regional project in the interest of the homeland in all major events, closed the House of Representatives and prevented the formation of governments for several months and interrupted the presidential elections for more than two years. Today he stands alone in the confrontation, without all the allies, Druze, Christians and Sunnis to fight. A purely Shiite confrontation in a case that lacks the coverage of the national charter. After 15 years in which he has woven all possible alliances throughout the nation, he is alone, resisting everyone, which is an important setback that is recorded in his political dictionary no matter what his intransigence reaches in the government file. .
Hezbollah’s project is deteriorating internally and externally, sources say, it is besieged abroad by heavy US sanctions and its constant pace to tighten the noose around its neck to the maximum limit, and at home adhering to an unconstitutional demand to through which he pays the severest blow to his Christian ally who stood by his side through thick and thin and covered him. “Presidential” in the strategic file Instead of securing the cover of the allied pact and saving it from a fatal fall, history will be recorded in the registry of President Michel Aoun.
This is most likely what Hezbollah is striving for. The sources add, citing a paragraph from its founding statement that says verbatim: “We confront the existing regime in Lebanon because it is a product of global arrogance and part of the anti-Islam political map and because it is an unfair combination in its foundations with which no reform or patch works, rather it is not. It must be changed from its roots. “This talk is a response to all of the above, but the text and the desire are one thing, the reality is another and not everything one wants to achieve. Hezbollah, the sources conclude, is losing the ability to manage the confrontation in a scenario very similar to that of the last days of the Syrian guardianship in Lebanon, and instead of learning from and through the lessons of the past and looking to the future, it seizes the French initiative that It serves almost as much as the interests of Lebanon. In an open struggle with the inside and outside revealing its true face, the sources conclude, and it is not surprising as long as its project does not resemble that of the Lebanese and that some of your interests intersect with a part of them at some point.
Source: Central News Agency
[ad_2]