[ad_1]
World – Lebanon
The problem is not that the enemy’s prime minister has been the victim of his traditional spectacle, but it lies in a professional error of strategic dimensions committed by one or both parties: or Netanyahu himself needed information, even false, to incite Hezbollah in his speech at the United Nations, or the intelligence apparatus. The one who made a serious professional mistake when he presented Netanyahu with what was supposed to be “final information” about a facility that Netanyahu proudly said had been confiscated. One of the reasons for the occurrence of the apparatus in this error may be the insistence of the political leadership on the need to provide information with specific characteristics that serves a purpose decreed in the context of the incitement policy.
In a few hours, “Israel” received a media coup no less than the coup that accompanied the bombardment of the battleship “Sa’ar” at sea during the war of July 2006, when the Secretary General of Hezbollah pronounced his famous phrase “Look at it ablaze”.
It fell into the hands of everyone, especially the media allies of “Israel” in Lebanon and abroad, who did not find time to play with what Netanyahu said.
Hezbollah delivered a strong political, propaganda and intelligence coup to the enemy entity, with its political and intelligence apparatus. In more direct terms, Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, in a live broadcast over the air, directed a resounding slap at the enemy prime minister, which will leave its echo, and perhaps its repercussions, within the Israeli intelligence system, and it will contribute to undermine the credibility of the top of the pyramid in Tel Aviv, and will lead to a litany of responsibilities. On the failure at a delicate moment internally, as well as in the context of the conflict with Hezbollah. Of course, the repercussions of the slap within the intelligence establishment may not come to light, but it will represent a station to draw lessons and try to answer specific questions: Where did intelligence make mistakes, where did Netanyahu make a mistake, and how can it be done? confuse false information in later stations?
The successful step taken by Hezbollah to undermine Netanyahu’s plan to exploit the UN platform represented a blow with the political and intelligence dimensions, and the propaganda strategy followed by “Israel” against the party. What exacerbates these dimensions is that the tools for its implementation were neither soldiers in the army, nor a minister, nor an administrative official, nor a distinguished expert, but rather the State as its entity, from the top of its hierarchy, from the highest international forum, and on a very delicate subject.
Before the port explosion on August 4, “Israel” followed a policy of incitement to the environment that incubated the resistance and the entire Lebanese people against it and its weapons. Israel saw in the incident an ideal opportunity that could represent solid ground and momentum for the incitement plan against resistance to new heights.
He adopted a propaganda policy based on exploiting the Lebanese fear of a reappearance of the disaster, and Netanyahu made no secret of his aim of this incitement. Rather, during his speech to the United Nations, he directly led the residents of the Jnah area in the southern suburbs and the rest of the Lebanese to rise up against Hezbollah, because “if this tent explodes it will fall into another tragedy. And the Lebanese citizens … should ask them to dismantle these warehouses. “
On the other hand, Hezbollah took a complex, two-way step, aimed at exposing Netanyahu’s lies and blocking the way for him and his intelligence to benefit from them later on. Sayyed Nasrallah announced that the media are immediately invited to visit the site Netanyahu had set up to cut off any subsequent accusations of emptying the facility, and in parallel he was willing to block the way to Israeli intelligence (specifically) by stating that this step “does not tie us to the principle that whenever Netanyahu talks about a place we should. Call the media. The importance of this restriction at this station is very essential, as it aims to prevent “Israel” from turning every claim that a location contains missile depots into an opportunity to expose the resistance and Lebanon for security.
At the messaging level:
Hizbullah achieved a qualitative achievement in the battle of conscience and public opinion. It is one of the most important scenarios and axes of the current conflict in Lebanon. While internal and external parties try to distort the image of the resistance and its weapons, which undermined Netanyahu’s credibility in the context of the battle for consciousness, as he was betting that this station would represent a qualitative asset on which to build his next. Steps. It is one of the most important aspects of this type of battle.
Rather than undermine the credibility of the resistance and incite the Lebanese people to do so, Netanyahu’s image and credibility were undermined. It can be said that any subsequent accusation of this type will from now on be questioned and disregarded by large sectors of public opinion in Lebanon and also by the enemy entity.
Hezbollah dealt a severe blow to “Israel” intelligence, which had allegedly provided Netanyahu with false and misleading information. It appears that the latter and his security and political personnel were based on the assumption that Hezbollah would either not invite media professionals to this place, as is their policy of strengthening the resistance for sure, or will do so at a later time. . Then Netanyahu and his apparatus, as happened previously, could claim that Hezbollah cleared the site of missiles.
Hezbollah has provided tangible evidence to the public that the goal of “Israel” is nothing more than incitement to resistance, which was what Netanyahu delivered during the speech (calling on the people of the wing to rise), based on a lot of lies and disinformation operations. What dictates that this station is recorded in the memory of public opinion as a witness and an indication of what will come next in terms of complaints and denunciations.
* News
