Hariri rejects the “constitutional breach” of the Lebanese judge, Sawan, when accusing Diab – Politics – News



[ad_1]

Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri announced the rejection of what he called “the constitutional violation”, committed by the investigating judge, Fadi Sawan, when trying the head of the provisional government, Hassan Diab, in the bomb attack in the port of Beirut.

Prime Minister Hariri’s remarks came after his visit to Prime Minister Diab at the Grand Serail yesterday afternoon, “where he met with the resigned Prime Minister Hassan Diab, to show solidarity with him after the prosecution against him in the case of the Beirut port explosion, “according to a statement issued by Prime Minister Hariri’s press office.

After the meeting, Prime Minister Hariri said: “I came to the Prime Minister to express my absolute rejection of the clear and flagrant constitutional violation that the judge committed in trying the Prime Minister.”

He added: “The constitution is clear and the heads of government are only represented before a special court, which will be formed by Parliament.”

Hariri added: “The position of prime minister is not to blackmail the other, and this matter is unacceptable and we will not accept it.” He said: “The families of the martyrs have the right to know the truth. They have the right to know who brought this ship and who covered it.” As for violating the constitution and claiming to be prime minister, this is unacceptable, and I came to support the prime minister and show my solidarity with him.

Earlier, in a statement yesterday, Hezbollah considered the recent actions taken by the Lebanese judicial investigator in the Beirut port bombing case, Judge Fadi Sawan, to be a political target of people and ignored others, and asked him to adopt unified standards.

Hezbollah’s statement came as a comment on the investigating judge’s decision on the Beirut port bombing, the prosecution of Acting Prime Minister Hassan Diab and three former ministers.

In its statement, the party said: “We confirm our interest in ensuring that all measures taken by the investigating judge are far from politics and purpose, in accordance with the provisions of the constitution, and are not subject to jurisprudence, interpretation or interpretation, and that the processing is carried out on logical and legal bases “.

Google Kiosk

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic events through Google News.

Share

Print




[ad_2]