[ad_1]
Whoever saw the reaction of former Minister Sajaan Azzi to the question of one of the announcers addressed to Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri on the Bkerke platform, and how the latter escaped the question and sadness invades his cheeks, and the joy that “The so-called” men “will be drawn on his face, he realizes that Hariri has” lovers “wherever he is a guest.
And Lebanese love often kills its owner. The clearest example of this is French President Emmanuel Macron, whose love for Lebanon brought him nothing but trouble. I almost feel sorry for the man. When he decided to visit Lebanon with the blessing of celebrating its centenary with a French contribution, it happened that the saltpeter room in the “port of death” exploded, so Macron changed tactics, from a ceremonial visit to a visit of condolence. , and accompanied her with a silent celebration on a second visit, which she pulled from her womb, and now when the resolution. By visiting Beirut according to what it says is visiting its forces operating within UNIFIL in the south, knowing that its foundations do not limit the pursuit of its political-economic initiative.
Thus, the effects of Macron’s visit ended before they began. The visit flew, according to a political reference for the “Lebanon Debate”, just as exactly the effects of the formation of the government, the scope of their flight, the limits and the distance of continuity that cannot be confirmed, and are linked. to the assessment of the conditions of the French administration in which its president works.
The reference says almost in secret that there is a “great hidden capacity behind the Lebanese class”, evidenced by the sudden and unplanned “Macron disease” that practically gives the “Lebanese political system” an additional grace period. to form a government and fix the internal situation, and as the factors of Macron’s current visit were not. Completed, completed later, which is a new French dependency in the era of Lebanese politicians!
There are those who are on the edge of malice, who claim to “fake Macron’s disease”, and some point to saying that the French president wants to relax from Lebanese concern, which is why he turned to the disease. Although the hypothesis is unrealistic, someone must believe it, after everything Macron found.
Until now, all the factors that make up the government remain frozen. What the “Lebanese Debate” mentioned yesterday about French contacts and communication with the authorities in effect of carrying out political actions did not bear fruit with more than one reference. Rather, the current situation led the Lebanese to propose to fix their situation in their own hands, which is why we now attend rounds of “flying” situation resolution between referrals. Part of it is headed by Major General Abbas Ibrahim, who was sent by President Michel Aoun to Ain al-Tineh with the intention of resolving the situation with the Speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berri. In the information, Ibrahim carried a letter from Aoun to Berri denying the authenticity of what was attributed to Aoun before the delegation of the Supreme Judicial Council, in addition to resolving other issues that the next few days should reveal.
In contrast to Aoun’s actions, Hariri worked to inform his head of the first Christian religious authority in the republic, so Bkerke attended with the intention of presenting what happened between him and the President of the Republic in the 12th session before Patriarch Mar Bishara Boutros al-Rahi, or in practice, Aoun complained to the sponsor. In an attempt to find a “government port” in Bkerke, with the intention of looking for a port in Baabda.
And in the disclosure session in front of the sponsor, sources assure that he had inside a silent excuse about the existence of “destabilizing” sectarian roles, either in relation to the issue of forming a government or providing support to the Hassan Diab government, linking his political movement recently within the framework of “constitutional rights and powers, and no.” In reaction to any sect. “
The Hariri movement denies him a number of facts. Basically, his problem with the President of the Republic is based on Hariri’s monopoly of appointing Christian ministers, since the president considers that he has the right to appoint the largest Christian parliamentary bloc. It is true that Hariri’s justification is based on the fact that he forms a government of specialists, but delving into the options and criteria that he presented to the minister differs from what he imposes on the President of the Republic, and this is well known to the sponsor. and he must have revealed it during the meeting with Hariri.
However, not all the sessions that took place during the last days can bring with them additional and positive data that lead to the disclosure of the date of government formation. At the time of writing these lines, the formation of the government has fallen into oblivion, and there is no single and clear factor that suggests that it may see the light in the foreseeable future, in relation to the developments that are taking place, either to national or regional level.
