[ad_1]
The previous one, within the framework of greetings, from the master of the patriarchal building, in the Christmas atmosphere, nothing more. The main objective of this visit is to suggest to the Christian street of Lebanon that there are “signs of hope” for the birth of a new government, with the approach of Christmas and New Year, “with the initiative and effort” of Hariri. But, in fact, “the movement of the future leader is without blessings.” It is taken for granted that what confirms the sincerity of the intentions to resolve the current government crisis is through Hariri’s abandonment of the exclusionary and abolitionist approach that he has followed from the first days of his last term to form The Desired Government, in a attempt to exclude the largest Lebanese and Christian parliamentary component from the decision-making position in the executive branch. And whoever really wants to comfort Christians, should stop interpreting the Taif Agreement, in a way that suits their authoritarian interests, and in a way that tickles the sectarian instincts of their street, to remain loaded and “absent. Demand “when any sectarian excitement on this street, the” leader “, employ them. Serving your various authoritarian and utilitarian interests simultaneously. Then, first, the recognition that the President of the Republic is a real partner in the formation of governments, and not a “bash kateb”, who formally signs the decrees of formation of the same. This approval is not a blessing from anyone, but rather in accordance with the implementation of the constitution, that is, Taif itself.
As for the new “proposal” that the president-designate brought to the Maronite Patriarchate, they are nothing more than a “new maneuver”, like the “provocative ministerial training” that he delivered last week to the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, also deceive national and international public opinion. That it continues with its “rescue initiatives”, and that the sources of obstruction are “Baabda” and “Mirna Al-Shalouhi”, in the opinion of a political authority familiar with the path of government formation.
He reveals that the “bombing proposal” that Hariri brought to the sponsor is based on three basic points: First, that a government composed of 18 ministers must be formed. Second, in it the President of the Republic ostensibly has six ministers, which means that he is not allowed to obtain the “third guarantor” in the government. Third, the participation between the presidents of the republic and the government in charge of the opinion on the selection of ministers supported by the March 8 team, that is (Hezbollah, Amal Movement, Al-Marada Movement and Social Nationalist Party Sirius). Here is the mine that Hariri is trying to pass through the “shot” that he presented to the shepherd.
The level of carelessness with the head of the “Arroyo Azul” has risen to a point that has led him to portray himself as “preferred” to the president of the republic, but from his “bag”, that is, the president’s bag, and always according to the referent’s opinion. Consequently, the distribution of Christian ministers in the “bombed formation” was as follows: Aoun appoints 6 Christian ministers, including the Minister of the Interior, according to Hariri. Likewise, a ministerial portfolio is assigned to the “nationalist”, of the nine Christian portfolios, and here the “future leader” wins for the president of the republic, “Jamila”, on the grounds that the “nationalist” is an ally of Aoun and the Free Patriotic Movement, noting that the “Syrian nationalist” did not abide by the decision of his allies, Hezbollah and the “movement”, as he appointed his deputies in the binding parliamentary consultations, Hariri, as the head in charge of forming the government , which indicates the inevitability of extending the alliance between the two parties beyond the formation of the expected government, according to the estimate of the reference.
Here the obvious question arises: “If Hariri is eager to award the” national “a consolation prize, as a beautiful response to the” national social bloc “that the votes of his representatives granted him in” consultations “, then why does he not allow in the field nominate a Sunni Muslim minister? Considering that the “nationalist party” is intersectarian and of sects? And what is mentioned in the “bombed formation” also assigns two bags to the “marda”, and another to the Tashnak party, and consequently, the actual participation of the country’s president is, In the end, there are only four ministers, according to the Hariri calculations.
On the other hand, the President of the Republic responded to this “mine” by maintaining his position that always calls for adherence to the implementation of the constitution and a commitment to the unity of standards in the selection of ministers and the distribution of portfolios in the future government, and this was confirmed by the first presidential delegate in Bkerke, Deputy Gebran Bassil. , Who confirmed, in turn, the pastor saying: “What applies to others applies to us.” Bkerke’s sources emphasized, for their part, that “summer and winter under one roof are unacceptable in composition, that is, stakeholders must adhere to the unity of standards in the government formation process.”
[ad_2]
