[ad_1]
In a statement to the Kuwaiti daily Al-Anbaa, in an article by journalist Zeina Tabbara, Charbel noted that “it was better for Presidents Aoun and Hariri to reach an agreement before the assignment, at least to consolidate ties of trust between them. , and thus at the minimum level of the government formation process, because Charbel considered that the set of contradictions A basket, an impossible blow and a complacency with nihilism, which means, from Charbel’s point of view, that before the lack of chemistry between the two parties, the discourse on the possibility of breaking the wall of complications that surrounds the process of government formation does not exceed the threshold of wishes.
In response to a question, Charbel stated that “the experience of President Berri’s abdication of a Shiite seat to facilitate the formation of the government of Prime Minister Mikati is not repeatable, at least during the current stage. If President Berri at that time he would not have been deeply sympathetic to President Mikati, the latter would have been seeking his government until now. ” This means that with the mistrust today between Presidents Aoun and Hariri, any concession, be it from Baabda or Beit al-Wasat, will be considered by the resigning party as a victory for the team that surrenders to it, and “baked from joys “.
Consequently, Charbel stated that we followed the path of Hell with the start of the civil war in 1976, and then we returned and confirmed this infernal path, with the launch of the so-called consensual democracy, and with the governments of “one third plus one” , so that we voluntarily and voluntarily put the state train on the Hell track, We headed towards it, not being indifferent to the results, as part of an external conspiracy that led to the bankruptcy of Lebanon and the hunger of the Lebanese people, with the The objective of imposing reconciliation with Israel, with a not simple paradox that Lebanese politicians contributed to consolidating the foundations of this conspiracy by throwing Lebanon of debt and plundering the treasure and corruption with the extensive operation. Political, financial and administrative.
On another level, Charbel affirmed that it is the right of the relatives of the martyrs of the port explosion, and the right of the wounded, afflicted and affected to know the truth of what happened, and the Lebanese people have the right of the judicial investigator to reveal who caused the destruction of its capital, considering that according to this sacred right, to summon a president. The interim government of Hassan Diab, for questioning him as a “moral” official, is necessary and fair to reveal the circumstances of the case, but the most important thing from the point of view of justice is to question all the “legal” officials, what group, group or sect belong.