[ad_1]
After being the target of US sanctions, even after the “confusion” of the US presidential elections, the brilliant, brilliant Lebanese politician, Gebran Bassil, got angry and roared!
In a televised speech, Bassil described the punishments as an injustice and said he would take legal action demanding compensation. In his speech, Basil proudly said that he had been pressured by the United States to cut his ties with Hezbollah. The genius of the Arab Mashreq, Gebran Bassil, added: “Hezbollah” is necessary to defend Lebanon. In October 2008, the author of these lines commented on Shuha Petra’s sermon to Basil’s leader, who is his son-in-law, Michel Aoun, at an event of his party’s party. And what came in those words:
Imagine someone saying these phrases and throwing these situations:
> “Iran is the only country that operates with complete independence and is known for its positions of support for national unity in Lebanon.”
> “Iran has never helped any Lebanese party against others.”
> “There is no objection to him receiving arms and money personally and partially from Iran.”
Meanwhile, Aoun launched a party rally (on the occasion of October 13, 1990), on the occasion that he was beatified as a political saint by his followers, when he was portrayed as the hero of the Syrian resistance, and ironically, on this very anniversary, the orange general embodied the language of “Hezbollah”, adding He must have his generational spirit, and his Hitler language, to launch a “divine” attack against Saudi Arabia and its (impure money!) and its role in Lebanon, recalling that the “petrodollar” is contaminated and that the Syrian security dimension has ended in Lebanon (who said that? Saudi occupier and with him the American role.
Dignified and veteran man, journalist and determined politician, like the great late Ghassan Tueni, recalled the careless, like Aoun at the time, in his latest article “Al-Nahar”, on the nature of the relationship between Lebanon and Saudi Arabia. since the days of the Lebanese Christian Amin Rihani, a friend of King Abdulaziz’s initiative, Saudi Arabia As the first Arab country to recognize the independence of Lebanon, and since the great intervention of Saudi Arabia to restore the constitutional life of Lebanon in the famous Taif agreement, this role has remained active and continuous.
Thus, when the son-in-law and the cub, Gebran Bassil, drenched in the smoke of the Iranian Khomeinist censer, and its bearer Hassan Nasrallah and his party in Lebanon, are following in the footsteps of the father-in-law, the leader, who enacted the bad year by consecrating this hateful sectarian atmosphere, which is entangled in the explosive idea of the “Satanist alliance”. In the East.
It is correct that we say: what interest do Christianity and Arab Christians have in this East, in a broad engagement with the Iranian team and its affiliates, against the rest of the Arabs, who are mostly Sunni Muslims?
Yes, Aoun, his son-in-law and his current are not a complete and complete representation of the Christians in Lebanon before they were the Christians of the Levant, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine and Egypt, for example.
However, it inflicts great damage on civil peace and provides abundant fuel for the holocaust of sectarian struggles and for the fiery and triggering religious and cultural wars.
[ad_2]
