France reassures Hezbollah … we’re not targeting you



[ad_1]

Ghada Halawi wrote in “Call of the Nation” that if France regretted “the inability of Lebanese political leaders to deliver on their promises to French President Emmanuel Macron to form a government in 15 days,” then their initiative is no longer understood. It has become an object of interpretation and speculation in light of the pitfalls that are taking place in the formation of the government that can overthrow the president-designate. The dilemma is that the behavior of the French does not match their positions. At least in regards to his relationship with “Hezbollah.” The announcement of the Shiite duo not to participate in the government alarmed the French and pushed them to reassure him about the positive evidence of the meeting that MP Muhammad Raad met with President Emmanuel Macron.

The multiplicity of messages that “Hezbollah” received from the French did not help to solve the mystery of the confusion that arises in his position on the behavior of the president-designate, Mustafa Adib, and who supports him in the formation of the government. During the last hours, the French were eager to convey a message that “we are not targeting him or have a project against him, and our kind words to MP Muhammad Raad are the best proof.”

Somewhere ambiguity surrounds French efforts regarding “Hezbollah” Will Hariri and Hariri act as one team? What is the truth about your position on Hariri’s refusal to give the Shiite couple the financial portfolio? And who authorized Hariri to manage the formation of the government? These and other questions reached French ears directly and through an intermediary, but the answers to them did not convince “Hezbollah” and the Shiite duo. Perhaps the French trusted the duo’s desire to reassign Hariri to form the government, and when he apologized, they insisted on adopting whoever they wanted. Hariri lived through the situation and wanted to play the role until the end. He did not study its steps and dimensions and that his bets will be disappointed. As if Hariri is not yet convinced that Hezbollah is stronger than these games and is not fooled, according to the words of sources familiar with the party’s position, who pointed out that Hezbollah considers that many reasons have led the French initiative to a dilemma. :

1- The team that took advantage of this initiative and with it the American sanctions to achieve a political coup in the country through which Hezbollah would leave the government achieving the American-Israeli objective, and the Shiites would have little representation in the government and not the would represent under the title of specialists.

2 – United States sanctions.

3- Try to exploit the financial and economic conditions to say that the one who caused these policies is the Shiite duo, although these political forces do not bear the full weight of the crisis, but have their part.

“Hezbollah” was suspicious of the team that made up the government’s insistence on withdrawing the financial portfolio of the two sides and forming the government alone, and on appointing Shiite ministers and specialists.

His concern increased the day Hariri visited the Speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berri, and told him that the Finance Ministry would not be on the Shiite side. When Berri refused, Hariri told him, Macron will talk to you!

Hezbollah insists, according to sources familiar with its airspace, that what happened is close to a coup against the balance of political forces in the country, and an attempt to isolate a political component and remove it from political power now. Any achievement of political objectives at different scales. Sensing the danger, he spoke with the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, explaining his vision of the issues, and Deputy Muhammad Raad explicitly told him: “If you want to rotate, let’s put it in the context of a project that is not limited to finance. Why insist on presenting it today and as a matter of charging the crisis with a single political team. ” Raad went on to say: “Let them rotate in the presidencies, ministries and functions of the first category and of the Supreme Council of the Judiciary, and that they are placed within the constitutional frameworks and a constitutional system, but without that, this team, to Through his way of managing the government, he plays with the destiny of the country and takes it into the unknown. “



[ad_2]