[ad_1]
Under the title: “Paris wants Hariri … from Riyadh,” Al-Akhbar writes: The failure of the first French initiative did not push the French president to withdraw from the Lebanese stadium, but led him to change his strategy because he is also convinced that there is no birth of a government without a president. Political government. Therefore, the French are working to feel Saudi Arabia on whether it is still lifting the veto in the face of the return of Saad Hariri.
The political forces turned off their engines after the fall of the French initiative, so the fate of the next government depends on two tracks: the first is related to the International Conference in Support of Lebanon, which French President Emmanuel Macron expressed the disposition of your country to host in the middle of this month. This will be a favorable opportunity for Paris to make its role and initiative known. As for the second track, it is related to the visit of the three presidents to Kuwait, since the information spoke of their trip on a plane, which means the possibility of returning heat to the relationship of President Michel Aoun and the president of the Nabih Berri Parliament. The atmosphere between the two presidents was not good, and there are those who bet on breaking the ice during the trip, and on the possibility of consensus on the direction of the next stage.
On the other hand, while Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah intensified his stance on the French president’s words in his last speech, the next day a meeting took place between the outgoing French ambassador to Lebanon, Bruno Foche, and the official. Hezbollah international relations officer, Ammar al-Musawi. The meeting was previously coordinated between the two parties and is part of the farewell visits that Foche is making. But the importance of this meeting lies in its timing, that is, after Sayyed Nasrallah’s speech.
This is in the form, but in the content, nothing is new. On the side of Hezbollah, there was nothing to say after Nasrallah’s position. On the French side, the reasons that led to the failure of the initiative were presented. The ambassador made it clear that the Lebanese administration over the initiative was what frustrated it. The sources indicated that the management of the government file will be different from the aforementioned, and that the composition rules have origins that derive from coordination with the parliamentary majority, and that the President of the Republic will not attend the invitation to consultations before the prior agreement with the majority on the proposed name, and after agreement on the name will be negotiated with him.
[ad_2]
