[ad_1]
Thousands of Lebanese demonstrated in the capital, Beirut, and other regions on Sunday against the political stalemate that prevented the formation of a government in the country for several months, amid a suffocating economic crisis, at a time when The diplomatic movement continued in search of a solution to the crisis of the government, while the visit of the Saudi ambassador to Lebanon Walid al-Bukhari was on Saturday, al Mukhtara and his meeting with the president of the Progressive Socialist Party, former MP Walid Jumblatt , the most prominent event in terms of the positions announced by Bukhari of Mukhtara and the emphasis on the historical relationship that links Mukhtara with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The data war continues
The sources of Al-Tadami indicated that “the visit of Al-Bukhari comes in its symbolism to the national and Arab authority represented by the elected, and to respond to all the voices that question his historical relationship with the Kingdom, and is significant to the light of the obstruction of the horizon before the formation of a government capable of initiating the necessary reforms to help the recovery of Lebanon, The visit confirmed the importance of the settlement initiative proposed by Jumblatt from the Baabda Palace, and that the Kingdom will always remain with Lebanon and is interested in its security, stability and protection. In light of the data war that has been unleashed again between the “Free Patriotic Movement” and the “Future Movement”, the member of the Future Bloc, Deputy Muhammad Hajjar, reiterated that “Hariri will not apologize for the authorship, and the only way to get rid of him if the political team wants Aoun-Bassil is to go to “early presidential elections, then there will be a new president and a new president assigned to form the government.”
Failure and indifference
Meanwhile, the Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Bechara Boutros Al-Rai, said in his sermon on the occasion of Palm Sunday in Bkerke: “The political group could have changed people’s perception of him and float his role if he woke up to reality. and he modified his behavior and worked to save Lebanon, especially after the bombing of the port of Beirut. But most of the officials went too far in error, failure and indifference, to the point that some of them gave priority to the interests of foreign countries and did not ask about the fate of the people who elected them, so who fell and confirmed that they are in no condition to lead this people who sacrificed themselves for the good of Lebanon and killed the best young men and women for the good of this country. He added: “We reject this reality and condemn all the political officials who led the state of Lebanon and the people of Lebanon to this tragic situation. This patriarchal edifice was never in favor of any official who distanced himself from saving Lebanon and its people. This building was never in favor of a power that intentionally refrained from respecting constitutional law and hindered the formation of governments. This building was never in favor of political groups that prioritize their personal aspirations at the expense of Lebanon’s sovereignty and independence.
A second wave of the uprising
In addition, the general secretary of the “Lebanese Communist” Party, Hanna Gharib, announced that “the party launched the second wave of popular uprising so that society is more mature and clear, and so that everyone is strengthened with their clear identity, and this It is the democratic uprising that started from all the squares of Lebanon starting from Bint Jbeil, Tire and Kafrman, then to Baalbek, Beirut, Akkar and Tripoli, until reaching Sidon, in addition to all the groups that call for a democratic state. , organized by the Communist Party, obstructed traffic in central Beirut, and military vehicles paraded the protest march, from in front of the Central Bank of Lebanon to the seat of government. Lebanon is facing an unprecedented economic crisis that has caused a decrease in the value of the local currency, a sharp rise in prices and an increase in poverty levels. However, the political parties waged a struggle for power and could not agree on the formation of a government to deal with the crisis.
