Damaging the Lebanese deposits is a crime … What does the law say?



[ad_1]


Damaging the Lebanese deposits is a crime ... What does the law say?

It says in “Al-Markazia”:

“Any reduction in mandatory reserve ratios, if it occurs, will go back to the depositors of the Banque du Liban, who are the owners of the banks, and for no other purpose.” Next.

A legal reference, which was considered through centralization, that “Governor Salameh is not used to violating the laws that govern monetary policy in the country, and that is why he is willing to respect the laws and regulations in force … and this is what he demonstrated throughout his tenure.

The reference pointed out that “the law is not far from logic … Therefore, touching the mandatory reserve for any reason constitutes the possibility of the“ crime of dishonesty ”, since the mandatory reserve is part of the deposits of people who they have accepted and trusted the banking system as a whole. The commercial bank to which Your money was entrusted, or the Central Bank that respects the principle of separation of powers and its total independence from the Lebanese government. “

And he said: The mandatory reserve, then, is a trust in the custody of the Central Bank for the benefit of depositors who have trusted the Lebanese banking system.

He also considered that “touching these deposits deals a fatal blow to the remaining confidence in the Lebanese banking and legal system,” and continued: Furthermore, the mandatory reserve is not a deposit that the depositor and the commercial bank voluntarily agreed to place in the Banque du Liban, but a mandatory deposit that has no other choice. Rejecting or accepting it. Its function is exclusively to mitigate the commercial risks of the deposits of private depositors.

In light of all this, the reference concluded by saying: “Just thinking about touching these deposits is a criminal offense against depositors and Lebanon.”



[ad_2]