[ad_1]
Sources close to the “supposed” alliance of the quartet affirm that the country can no longer tolerate being thrown into sectarian divisions on the threshold of entering a new political stage with the expectation that former Prime Minister Saad Hariri will be assigned to form a new government, and they confirm that there is no interest in any party resorting to dragging the country into a new cycle. From sectarian projection to sectarianization of the authorship process.
The same sources ask: What is the point of returning the country to the starting point and showing the current conflict as a conflict between Muslims and Christians and remembering as if someone were planning to overthrow the “national tendency” similar to what happened on October 13 1990 when the army commander, General Michel, was deported at that time? Aoun from the Republican Palace in Baabda?
In light of the insistence of the “National Movement” in promoting the establishment of a quadripartite alliance, he also asks about the fate of the document of understanding signed by the secretary general of “Hezbollah” Hassan Nasrallah, with the founder of the “movement”, the General Aoun, at St. Mikhael’s Church in Chiyah in February 2006. And she says: Has the head of the movement, Deputy Gebran Bassil, decided to unilaterally overthrow the understanding to pass a message to the United States, in the hope of regain your chances of running in the presidential election?
The sources pointed out that promoting the establishment of a quadripartite alliance is a creation of Bassil, his media and some of his deputies belong to the “national current”, which is why others consider it unfounded, since those responsible for this alliance are still unknown. .
She sees that Bassil is under an international and internal blockade and is trying to launch the accusation against his opponents, although he did not forgive his ally “Hezbollah”, but through his television channel, accusing him of his participation in the quadripartite alliance. . The sources ask: Are his opponents responsible for deporting him, according to the decision of the Undersecretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker, about the schedule of meetings he held in Beirut, similar to what the Undersecretary of State for States did? United, David Hale?
On the other hand, other political sources confirm that Bassil now lives in isolation, almost besieging him on all sides, if there are no contacts between the “National Movement” and “Hezbollah”, and they say that he is betting that President Aoun resuscitate him through training of the government, although “A strong era” needs to be saved in the last third of its mandate.
Sources hold Bassil responsible for the isolation he imposed on himself, especially in light of his overthrow of the agreement that Hariri concluded with Aoun and facilitated the latter’s election as President of the Republic, and also for his overthrow of the understanding “Maarab “between Aoun and the head of the” Lebanese Forces “party.
And it confirms that Bassil greatly harmed the “strong era” that did not place limits on his actions in the control of the main articulations in the state administrations, and this is what put him in political battles with most of the political forces from the movement “Marada” to the “Progressive” movement to the “Amal” movement. »Led by the President of Parliament, Nabih Berri. She believes that Bassil took advantage of Aoun’s accession to the presidency to launch campaigns against others in an attempt to nullify them, especially those who are competing with him for the presidency, and confirms that the sectarianization of the government crisis has reacted negatively to him and has not found an answer on the Christian street.
It reveals that Bassil tried to reconnect with the ‘forces’ and bet that there is the possibility of reactivating cooperation, and thus it was demonstrated in his mediation, a former minister to carry out the task of mediating between them, but he did not succeed because Bassil he is responsible for overthrowing the declaration of intent that Aoun and Samir signed. Geagea, who had a role in handing him over to the presidency.
The “National Movement” also tried to persuade Maronite Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi to organize a meeting of Maronite leaders, but the “forces” and “brigades” stipulated that Bassil issue a statement supporting the sponsor’s call for neutrality of the Lebanon that precedes the understanding of the political program for the current stage, in addition to the fact that the “marada” is not about to float those who brought power to the impasse and got involved in political confrontations with allies and opponents.
Consequently, the insistence of the “national movement” in promoting the establishment of a quadripartite alliance between the Islamic forces rebelled against him negatively, and Basil – as Christian sources say – could not open a window that would allow him to leave the political fence that was imposed on him, and this is what prompts him to position himself under the mantle of Aoun. The designated prime minister has a list that is a book of conditions that could push him to float after losing control of several of the representatives of his bloc, forcing him to turn to the political council of the “National Movement” to renew his position. rejecting Hariri’s commission.
[ad_2]
