After the uproar of the forms with the journalist Clara Juha …



[ad_1]

After colleague Clara Juha and her husband Jimmy Hadchiti, a journalist for the channel “Al Jadid”, found a problem with a member of the Internal Security Forces, due to a parking lot, in the Chiyah area, the Bar Association of Beirut held an emergency meeting, led by the head of the Bar Melhem Khalaf, to pronounce on the case of lawyer Jimmy Hadchiti After deliberation, the Board issued the following statement:

First: The Bar Association, the horrible scenes and events that accompanied this case; In some details, it was clear that the colleague lawyer had attacked him and his media wife, Clara Juha, in front of the eyes of their children, by the security forces, in the Chiyah area, and the Bar Association He took note of what happened at that very moment, and insisted that things take their due legal and judicial course to fully clarify. The facts and the fulfillment of rights, which led the lawyer and his wife, calmly and in good faith, to go to the Chiyah police station to file an immediate complaint against the attackers, and while listening to the lawyer’s testimony, one of their attackers He entered and beat him again, before the eyes of his wife and the lawyer assigned by the Bar Association and his superiors in the security forces. The present; The judge overseeing the investigations completed these “surreal” scenes by giving a signal to arrest the lawyer and detain his freedom, and transfer him to the Hammana police station to spend the night behind bars, only left during the preparation of this statement.

Second – The Bar Association will ask:

Are security forces allowed to attack people according to the uncontrolled whims of their members?

Do the security forces have the right to attack a lawyer and a journalist, regardless of the reasons and details of the problem, without any rights?

Do the security forces have the right to continue their assault by beating the lawyer again inside the police station, in front of the investigator?

Did the judge in charge of the investigations comply with the principles stipulated in article 79 of the Law that regulates the Legal Profession and other legal texts and the principles stipulated in the circulars issued by the discriminatory Public Ministry related to the mechanisms of hearing of the lawyers?!

Does a judge have the right to order the arrest of a lawyer, contrary to the established rules, as a consequence of arbitrary detention and detention at liberty?

Is it the judicial police who order some of the judges?

And the questions continue!

These are very serious wholesale violations that indicate that the rule of law has fallen and that the law of the jungle has superseded the constitution and existing laws and regulations! The Illustrious Bar Association had repeatedly warned against reaching this point and falling for the prohibited! Forbidden has been signed!

Third – The Bar Association regrets the moment in which we find ourselves:

Is it time to suppress freedoms?

Is it time to install the files?

Is it time to intimidate people and obey the judiciary?

Is it a time of bullying, intimidation and intimidation?

Is it time for the security police state?

Is it a time for harassment, beatings, torture, insults and insults?

Is it time to escape responsibility and darken the military uniform, which is supposed to be the protector, to terrorize people and children?

Is it the time of the dictatorship of the security services?

Is it a time when the judiciary and some judges were not independent?

Is it time to eliminate justice by breaking one of its wings, which is the legal profession?

How much we call the Supreme Council of the Judiciary and its president, Judge Suhail Abboud, that it is worth intervening to save what can be saved in terms of values, good relations and regularity for the work of the institutions, and the leaders of the Security forces are obliged to control the behavior of their members and force them to assume morals to protect people.

Fourth – The Bar Association raises its voice to rescue state institutions from their corrupt, saboteurs. We will not leave competent judges for a judge who has forgotten his oath and mission, and we will not leave heroic security men for an element who has forgotten or forgotten that cedar crowns his forehead with pride to protect the people. .

Letters are reaching the Bar Association and the Bar Association, and the last message has arrived!

If lawyers need to be silenced from telling the truth, they will not be silent!

If lawyers are going to be subjected to the whims of some security forces and some judges, they will not submit!

And if lawyers are to be intimidated by physically attacking them, they will not be afraid!

And if lawyers must submit to the violation of their dignity, they will not give in!

If attorneys are required to surrender to the objection of achieving justice in cases large and small, they will not surrender!

As for whether lawyers are required to weaken in the context of the dissolution of the state, they will not weaken! They will not be satisfied with this dissolution!

Fifth – The Bar Association announces, in light of this grip that we have reached, to continue to stop working tomorrow, Tuesday 05/1/2021, with its call to a symbolic stand of protest with the lawyer’s suit in the courthouses from all the provinces, at two in the afternoon. Ten o’clock; The Bar Association trusts the role of the Ministry of Justice and the Superior Council of the Judiciary to meet with the Illustrious Bar Association to strengthen the relationship between the two branches of justice, provided that the Bar Association sessions remain open to follow up on all developments and announce successive efforts to save justice and the homeland.

Security forces explain

Later, the security forces issued an explanation of the forms in which they said: “After circulating a video on social networks and the media about a problem that arises between the journalist Clara Juha and the officer in charge of ensuring traffic at the Samaan Gallery and the intervention of her husband, the lawyer Jimmy Hadchiti, it is important that the General Directorate clarifies the following:

First: Those who care about the homeland repeatedly ask us to stand firm against misleading media campaigns, as if what is required is to be a media platform and not a security institution whose objective is to achieve the right and maintain security and safety. order. Predators take advantage of opportunities, and in each incident they show a fragmentary image of the truth to invest it to their advantage and take advantage of it, especially through social networks.

Second: just as some media always blame the Internal Security Forces, knowing that in this way, and in these fateful circumstances, they are contributing to hitting the main pillar of the country, which is security.

Third: It is regrettable that some of the people in charge of applying justice and defending the oppressed and the truth, look provocatively and condescendingly at the security element that supervises the implementation of the laws, and intimidate the elements of the security forces. internal security during the performance of their duty instead of appreciating their efforts and sacrifices for the sake of the security and stability of the homeland.

Fourth: It was more efficient for the spouses, who were the subject of the problem, to respect the law and comply with the element by removing the car from the place, which obstructed the movement of traffic at the intersection of the Samaan Gallery, in order to provide the best example to his two children in the car.

Fifth: When investigating the platoon in question, it was clear that the media had parked her motor vehicle differently in front of the “Karout Mall” complex, preventing traffic, and when the policeman asked her to remove it from her place she She refused, considering she was waiting for her husband to finish shopping for some of the necessities, so she filmed the rape and then returned. He rolled him into the intersection without taking any action. Upon the return of her husband from the aforementioned compound after contacting him, he immediately went to the crossing (and if he left with his wife at that time, the problem would not have occurred) and began to insult the officer and accuse him of hitting his wife, then a cyclist came to attend to this problem, and he, in turn, was subjected by the lawyer to obscene words and pushed him. So the rider had to fend for himself.

During the investigation within the peloton, the lawyer again accused the cyclist of insulting the cyclist, which caused the latter’s reaction and an attempt to harm him, and he was prevented from doing so.

Based on the indication of the Judicial Power, the motorcyclist and the lawyer were detained at that time, and the signal and information component was left in exchange for two residence documents, so the Judicial Power returned and left the two detained under two residence documents the next day.

The General Directorate of Internal Security Forces will always remain interested in implementing the applicable laws and regulations. Calls on citizens not to be dragged behind rumors, false news or images and videos that do not reveal the whole truth, but reveal a part of it, and to extract the correct information from its source in the Internal Security Forces, the Public Relations Division.



[ad_2]