[ad_1]
After the Public Ministry announced on Wednesday night, Thursday, the charge of “conspiracy to commit a terrorist murder” against six people, including two minors between the ages of 14 and 15, in the case of the murder of history and geography professor Samuel Patti , and putting minors under judicial control after their release, Questions were again raised about how to treat minors in terrorism cases in France.
Authorities suspect that the two underage students received a sum of between 300 and 350 euros from the murderer to help him find the history teacher.
But the more important question remains, were they aware of the plot of the Chechen-born Russian assassin, Abdullah Anzurov, when he asked them to lead him to Samuel Patti? That is the central question on which the investigating judge in the fight against terrorism, responsible for the murder file, will focus, especially since the murderer would not have met Samuel had it not been for the help of the minors, and also them She said she wanted to photograph him apologizing for what he presented in class after hitting and insulting him.
French law professor Jean-Philippe Dum said in a statement to “Sky News Arabia”: “Since 2016, there has been an increase in the number of cases classified as terrorist involving minors, as some 50 minors have been tried for charges of belonging to terrorist cells or for his attempt to travel. To Syria to join ISIS.
Between 2012 and 2019, 52 minors were tried for criminal conspiracy. Faced with this situation, the judges specializing in children’s issues in the Paris courts were subjected to training dedicated to dealing with terrorism cases, the first of its kind in Europe. Of the 15 juvenile judges in the Parisian judiciary, half are dedicated to terrorism cases.
The law professor explains that if “the minor is as susceptible to litigation as anyone else, which means that he must be held criminally responsible for his actions, then the aspect of understanding remains the key word in juvenile justice.”
He adds: “In the coming weeks, and as part of a judicial investigation process, provided by the judicial protection of minors,” adolescents will be subjected to psychological interviews before presenting a report to the judge, because the personal history of these minors, the family and the social context in which they were raised, at the same time that it seeks to understand the perception of danger of these adolescents. The facts or what is prohibited by law, and establish if they knew the plot in advance, because if it is proven, they will become the main suspects of participating in a terrorist act. But if they don’t know the details, your accusation will be limited to participating in a criminal act.
The law professor concludes by saying: “I think the French government should allocate a larger budget for education and social follow-up, because today we really need guidance and advice in our society.”
Under French law, if the charges against minors are proven, the penalties can reach 20 years in prison.
[ad_2]
