[ad_1]
After the regimes of the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain have completed their entrusted mission to strengthen the political, security and economic supply of the enemy entity in the context of the war it is waging against the peoples of Palestine and the region , all eyes are on the Saudi regime, which is awaiting the completion of the mapping of the required parameters and determining the timing of the Gulf convoy operating on the chart. The direction of the conflict is towards priorities that are in line with Israeli interests and priorities. In this context, the head of the “Mossad”, Yossi Cohen, in an interview with “Channel 12” of Israeli television, reiterated that the agreement with Saudi Arabia was “within reach”, expressing his conviction that this could be achieved ” during this year, “again saying Many countries, both in the Gulf and outside the Gulf, will also join the ranks of normalization, while Israeli reports said that” the next country will be the Sultanate of Oman, “which sent its ambassador in Washington at the signing of the two “peace” agreements with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain at the White House.
The ceremonies are not, and the additional episodes that will follow in the series itself, except as a result of a secret and open path that extended over the last years, supervised by the agency “Mossad”, whose official mission is to manage relations with non-printed countries. This was confirmed by Cohen himself, saying that his apparatus “is always working to reach a situation in which we establish relationships at different levels. At first, it can be economic relations, trade relations and reciprocal relations to understand the security, regional and international events. In the end, I think our goal is to achieve official relations with the Arab countries. Based on this, Cohen called the two Israeli agreements with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain “the culmination of years of efforts and contacts that are managed in a very precise way.” These efforts exerted by the Mossad, which is directly affiliated with the prime minister, reap the fruits of the political level and build on them plans that directly aim, as stated in the Israeli political and media discourse, first at the Palestinian question and then at Iran. as the strategic depth of the resistance axis. On this, Cohen said: “The agreements signed with Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates represent a very big message that goes beyond the idea of supporting Israel. The accords are a strategic change in the war against Iran.
It is highly unlikely that the Hebrew entity plays a direct role in protecting the printed systems.
Although the attempts to strategize the two Israeli agreements with the Bahraini and Emirati regimes seem overblown, considering the size of the two countries and their regional role, the matter will be different when the Saudi regime joins them, as then It is possible to speak of a new regional map that has a strategic character. However, the normalization of all these regimes does not coincide with their repercussions for Egypt’s exit from the confrontation with Israel, through the “Camp David Accords” in 1979, which caused a radical shift in the balance of power in favor of the enemy. It was a change that needed another equivalent to the size of the Iranian revolution to contain its repercussions and to correct the movement of regional reality in different directions from those planned four decades ago.
In the direct repercussions of the last two agreements, it is highly unlikely that the Hebrew entity will play a direct role in protecting the newly printed systems with it, or that it will approach the limits of military intervention to deal with any threats. that comes your way. Likewise, Israel is unlikely, in the foreseeable future, to establish military bases for itself in the Gulf, as is sometimes circulated, and the reason is simply that it does not want to place military targets directly in front of the enemy that could restrict its ability to make aggressive trading options in the region. Especially towards Iran. On the other hand, print regimes will continue to play a security role in the interest of Tel Aviv, this time with artificial political legitimacy.
With respect to the Palestinian question, it is clear that establishing a new era called the declared Arab alliances with the enemy entity necessarily means exacerbating attempts to liquidate the Palestinian cause. Thus, it appears that the next stage will witness an escalation of aggression against the Palestinian people, with the participation of normalization regimes who believe that the Palestinians’ insistence on keeping their cause alive will undermine many of their efforts and plans, and it will constitute a continuous condemnation of them. Therefore, it will treat every Palestinian position that demands minimal rights like a missile aimed at its thrones.
The US ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, inaugurated the direct war against Palestine and its people, again attacking the Palestinians, considering that the Arab-Israeli conflict has reached “the beginning of the end” in light of the agreements of standardization. In a clear message to Ramallah, Friedman revealed, in an interview with the newspaper “Israel Today”, that the United States of America is considering replacing the former leader of the “Fatah” movement, Muhammad Dahlan, with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas. , adding that “we have no desire to create leadership.” Palestinian ». It seems that Friedman wanted to suggest that Ramallah’s insistence on rejecting the normalization policy and his reluctance to grant it Palestinian legitimacy will push Washington to overthrow the current leadership, which he believes is still “clinging to the same old grievances, which I don’t think is are relevant. “
In a parallel vein, Washington, and with it Tel Aviv, continues to refuse to provide an umbrella, even a cosmetic one, for the UAE and Bahrain in their normalization options. Friedman stressed that the postponement of the implementation of the annexation plan is nothing more than a “temporary suspension”, noting that the current US administration is the first administration to recognize the legitimacy of the settlements, and to publish a “peace plan” that it excludes the eviction of settlers from their homes throughout the West Bank, which it had previously indicated in the past. Which is “part of Israel”.
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
