[ad_1]
Last Saturday, the Secretary General of “Hezbollah”, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, at the end of his Ashura speech, allocated a space to talk about the media and virtual media, as today a real battle against the resistance is being fought. After framing the issue theoretically and refuting those he described as the owners of the only “black room” that publishes the same misleading and fabricated news and posts it on various platforms, he named “Al Arabiya”, “Al Hadath” and “Sky News “and refrained from mentioning any local stations. At the time, he called his fans to what he called the confrontation of these channels and the rest of social networks, practicing a “negative boycott”, that is, ignoring any follow-up to these platforms. Since then, there have been massive campaigns on this speech and its content. Of course, the choir runs the “Al-Arabiya” and “Al-Arabiya / Al-Hadath” channels that were mentioned that night, as they continue to systematically campaign against Nasrallah’s words and distort them, using Lebanese faces known for his attack on Hezbollah and to photograph the boycott called by the Secretary General. Hezbollah, as a kind of attempt to blind the public to the knowledge of “facts” or “facts” that the party wants to hide from them! After moving to the interior of Lebanon, and with Nasrallah not to mention a local Lebanese station, MTV always feels like the target of the speech, since yesterday he exploited the subject of preventing him from entering the Republican Palace to launch an attack on the party, when he hinted at the presentation of your evening newsletter. He initially believed that the ban was “issued by a militia allied to the Pact” and “as an executive addendum to the threats we receive from Sayyed Nasrallah”, in a new delusional path the station is taking, which has formed and continues to be the spearhead of the party since the port was bombed about a month ago, and it worked. On the transfer of security accounts reported by some western newspapers about the party’s relationship with ammonium nitrate in an attempt to implicate it in the attack. In the midst of this atmosphere in which some media portray themselves as victims and are subject to intimidation and prevention, they did not insist on asking a real question about accountability and accountability for them, and responsibility. social and national that local channels must carry, if we put aside those hostile Gulf platforms known for their fabricated and misleading news. . We have not heard an apology for fabricating false news or spreading misleading information or inciting. All this open action is available and there is no question about the moral responsibility of the media. Thus, the facts are again distorted, and the call for a passive boycott (the most democratic method) becomes used in the dictionary of intimidation and intimidation, and the basic problem of performance and responsibilities is absent in a country that lacks the slightest commitment to professionalism and ethics.
[ad_2]
