A statement from the “Amal” movement in response to Macron … “Shocked and rejected!”

The political bureau of the Amal Movement stated that “the movement was the first to draw up a reform document, based on economic, financial and administrative facts, and presented it at the Pine Palace meeting, and for this it adopted and supported the French initiative in his clear text that contains steps and ideas for the reform decisions necessary to save the country, and President Nabih Berri promised to facilitate the approval of the laws necessary for these procedures in the Council of Representatives.

The statement noted that “the movement remains committed and supporting this text, which expresses a national need in parallel with the importance of external care and support for it.”

He stressed that “the movement’s position in assigning Mustafa Adib to form the government was clear in supporting the establishment of a capable and strong government that includes the best qualified and specialists, and is committed to the reform program, and its position during the formation negotiations was consistent with democratic principles that respect the positions of political blocs and do not deny the results of parliamentary elections. ” That “this is what the president-designate confiscated, the authorship process tried to circumvent and set conditions and rules related to the rotation and distribution of portfolios and names for their interests, ignoring the reality of the French initiative and using it to establish a new method in the formation of governments “.

He said: The movement, while respecting the role played by French President Macron, is surprised by the accusations and responsibilities he has made, especially to the national duo (Amal Movement and Hezbollah), moving away from the facts and the facts of the discussions with him. President-designate, a note that its President, Speaker Nabih Berri, was and continues to be At the forefront of those who wish to preserve the stability of Lebanon and the unity of its people, and the regularity of the work of its political and constitutional institutions, and the precursor of the management of internal dialogue between the various forces and in complex political circumstances, which call for the establishment of a civil state.

The movement rejected “in any way what arose from the accusatory words that circulated to all the parties in terms of profit and money collection”, considering that “the speech contradicts the fact that the movement is at the forefront of demanding surrender. of accounts and scrutiny, and the approval of relevant laws, and considers this a political lapse of its absolute that does not help the initiative to be successful. That we are eager to continue and achieve the objectives that are requested to help Lebanon “.