[ad_1]
According to observers, this analysis was based on Esper’s performance and his objection to two important decisions Trump had previously made:
The first, when Esper supported the national shutdown, while Trump opposed it on the pretext of protecting economic interests.
The second, when Esper rejected Trump’s decision to use military force to suppress protesters during the recent unrest in the United States.
However, Trump did not act at the time, and did not make a decision at the time to isolate Esper, choosing the moment at this particular stage and after his “loss” in his presidential battle, which he did not acknowledge until now.
Observing diplomatic sources they say that Trump’s decision is suspicious and suspicious, and it is necessary to review it, especially after accepting the appeal he filed after questioning the results of the presidential elections. However, the question posed, which concerns Lebanon, according to observers, is not to anticipate the loss of Trump or win the appeal, but to anticipate the reason that led him to remove his defense minister. These outweigh two possibilities for your decision:
The first: the controversial figure of Trump, who took advantage of his last days in the White House to take revenge. This issue can be glimpsed through a series of internal and external decisions recently taken by his administration, most of which are overwhelmed by a “vindictive character.” This is how the Democratic president of the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, put the sudden dismissal of Defense Secretary Mark Esper in this context, saying “it is a test He is concerned about Trump’s determination to use his last days in the presidency to wreak havoc in America and around the world, saying, “Trump’s recklessness threatens national security.”
– Second, informed political circles exclude that Trump’s decision has reasons related to his personality or his desire for revenge, confirming that foreign interests and the national security of the United States are bigger than a personal story. He noted that the most powerful country in the world does not deal with its leaders and officials for revenge, especially in the face of great and dangerous rights, because the interest of the national security of the United States is the priority and takes priority over all retaliation and personal decisions.
The same circles claim that the issue here is “not personal,” and that the great possibility is that the US Secretary of Defense has rejected an important and great decision that Trump recently made that forced him to remove him from his current team I am working to implement this decision. Those circles believe that the decision of the president of the United States was military par excellence, that is, a military attack.
Politicians wonder about the date of this strike and where will its arena be. Was he in South Lebanon, Iran or the neighborhood, especially since Esber’s firing coincided with disturbing and symbolic events that Lebanon witnessed?
Withdrawal from Lebanon of the Saudi, Emirati and Kuwaiti ambassadors.
– Tweet “Mujtahid” in which he talks about the mobilization of the Saudi and American armies on Saudi soil.
– A severe warning issued by the Canadian embassy in Lebanon through a statement in which it warned its citizens of the danger of terrorist acts and military operations that can cover all regions.
Those circles wonder about the scene of the alleged military attack, if the expectations in this regard are correct and the concern that it will be in the neighborhood, and the indication of this is that an Israeli observation of a drone over the occupied territories shows that it was Hezbollah that sent it. Press here.
