[ad_1]
The Netherlands submitted a memorandum to the Syrian regime asking it to assume its international responsibilities due to human rights violations such as torture and the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
According to a statement issued by the Dutch House of Representatives, a memorandum has been presented to the Syrian mission to the United Nations, inviting the regime to dialogue on the human rights violations it has committed in the country.
The communiqué affirmed that the Syrian regime violated the United Nations Convention against Torture of 1984, through human rights violations against its citizens since 2011. It urged the regime to accept its responsibility for these violations and to compensate the victims for the damage it caused them.
He also called on the Syrian regime to give guarantees to the Netherlands that torture and other human rights violations will stop and will not be repeated.
Commenting on the letter, Dutch Foreign Minister Steve Blok said that the Assad regime is responsible for human rights violations in Syria. He added that finding a permanent political solution in Syria requires that those responsible for these violations be held accountable.
The Netherlands is preparing a lawsuit against Syria before the International Court of Justice, which seeks to hold the Syrian government responsible for human rights violations, including torture and the use of chemical weapons.
Block stated: “The Assad regime has repeatedly committed horrible crimes, and the evidence is compelling and must have consequences. Syria was informed of the legal step that precedes the possibility of referring the case to the International Court of Justice.”
The responsibility of the “Syrian state”
One of the strong and important points of the Court of Justice is that it constitutes a unique accountability mechanism, since it deals with violations of international law outside the responsibility of the entity, that is, the Syrian State, which is the opposite of what works in the use of universal jurisdiction. That they constitute an accountability mechanism in matters of individual criminal responsibility.
Al-Kilani believed that “any compromise or outcome of the court against the Syrian government will constitute a precedent and condemnation of the Syrian government, and will legally threaten its legitimacy.” He added that the condemnation and accountability of the Syrian regime represented by its government from the point of view of the responsibility of the state as an entity based on its policy of systematic violations and the scope of its impact, “will undoubtedly be more influential than language. of the investigation committee reports “.
The Syrian regime’s Foreign Ministry denounced the case, saying the Dutch government uses the International Court of Justice to serve the agendas of its “American master.” He added that “The Netherlands is the last to have the right to speak about the human rights and suffering of the civilian population in Syria after its scandal in front of its people as a result of supporting and financing armed organizations in Syria that the Dutch Public Ministry classifies as terrorist organizations “.
The Netherlands decided to take this step after Russia obstructed the UN Security Council’s efforts to refer human rights violations in Syria to the International Criminal Court, which is trying people accused of war crimes, also based in The Hague.
[ad_2]
