Washington prevents the formation of the Lebanese government



[ad_1]

The world – Lebanon

So he became someone looking for activities to occupy his time, including visiting Baabda Palace every other day, even if he has no solutions or facilities. Whereas, President Aoun’s permanent advice is limited to the need for him to meet with all parliamentary blocs before the recent agreement with him, which the president-designate has so far rejected. Therefore, all the posters and information indicate that the possibilities of forming a government are lacking, which is what Hariri personally realized after his meeting with the US ambassador in Lebanon Dorothy Shea, who informed him of her country’s refusal to represent Hezbollah in government, directly or through so-called specialists.

While Hariri, until the date of the meeting, counted on an American to “turn a blind eye” to this issue. This “incapacitating” condition, added to the fact that the French impose the names of the finance and energy ministers, tied up the prime minister, who had the luxury of forming a government in the first week, through an internal agreement, but preferred to raise the ceiling of their requests and settle their personal accounts, thus opening the door to collapse in their capacity. Meanwhile, his bet stood until yesterday in a strong Franco-American declaration that would force the parties to make concessions to him, but his bet was again disappointed.

Today, Hariri has become a prisoner of the “layoffs” of the US administration, especially since he does not have the courage to ignore them to form a government that he sees as a service to “Lebanon first” and an attempt to get out of the economic collapse caused. by the model that, together with the allied and partner political forces, still clings to it. Here, in contrast to what US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is promoting about “American efforts to establish a stable government focused on reforms in Lebanon,” the United States is the first obstacle to what the latter spoke, and his Conditions prevent the formation of a national government represented by parliamentary blocs, including Hezbollah. . That is to say, about two weeks ago the American climate changed, showing a “lack of concern” towards the Lebanese situation, to be replaced by a militant environment that rejected Hezbollah’s entry into the government.

Most important of all this is that the US agenda, which has a single point of hindering the formation of the government and passing reforms, has found in Lebanon someone who submits to it and carries out its “sanctions” with total professionalism. Hariri therefore seems confused, unable to compose, nor can he apologize, to join the caravan from which he named and killed himself. To date, your best solution is to win more time and double your outside bets.

Parallel to Hariri’s submission to the United States, the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, Gebran Bassil, yesterday raised the challenge again before the United States, announcing his willingness to leave political life if accusations of corruption were proven against him, and asked how a great country like the United States “ keeps all the money transfers in the world. ” Can you reveal everything? Please note that I am the first to reveal your stories to the Lebanese public. ‘

Bassil indicated during an interview on the Saudi channel Al-Arabiya-Al-Hadath that he was “aware of the possibility of publishing the minutes of the meetings between him and the Americans, and every time he spoke, he thought of Wikileaks.” He considered the statement by the US ambassador that he had promised to break the alliance with Hezbollah on conditions, “a failed attempt to drive a wedge … If we want to break the alliance, we do so of our own free will and in accordance with Lebanese interest, and not by an external will, the result of which is to alter civil peace. ” Assuming that we want to break the alliance, we inform the interested party and discuss with him before the matter, and when we despair, we solve the matter … As for what is usual for some of treason, treason and damage to the national constants For unknown purposes, this is unacceptable to us.

He stressed that Lebanon benefited from the relationship between the National Movement and Hezbollah, noting that “history has taught us that isolating any sect leads to an explosion, and here we are talking about a complete component, not just Hezbollah.” . In response to proposals to break the alliance with the party, he said: “I say to the American out loud, give me what preserves the security, stability and strength of Lebanon and do not attack it, so I go up to the roof and do not I keep quiet and tell Hezbollah directly, then I tell the Lebanese that this is what comes to Lebanon as the price for breaking the relationship. They gave us an American and international commitment to strengthen Lebanon, return its land and return the displaced, and so that we have a country capable, with a strategic military balance, to confront, because this is something that I put on the negotiating table with Hezbollah and the Lebanese hinterland … that is, a real program and not just promises.

In another context, Bassil revealed during his discussion of the battles to liberate the jroud, that “with what concerns us on Lebanese soil and with the Syrian neighbor, we carried out a battle as Lebanese when the army did not take what was necessary, for a political decision that was despicable, during the government of Tammam Salam. When the political decision was made during the era of General Michel Aoun, we liberated the land and defeated the terrorists.
In the October 17 issue, Bassil saw that the slogans raised against him by the protesters identified with the outside world, indicating that the “October 17” protesters attempted to assassinate him politically. Regarding the issue of government, he indicated that his accusation of obstructing the formation of the government is “an old tone, and we have not yet set a condition or a requirement, and we only demand the unity of standards in the composition.” He revealed that there are “government promises given to the country that do not coincide with what was given abroad, and when they are collected in this way, the” puzzle “is not installed, and if the promises are respected, the government is formed in 24 On the other hand, he stressed that he has no objections to not being represented in the government by any of the political forces, “but no one can intimidate us from the outside, and we made the decision not to be in the government, and that is not it can be imposed on us. “On the other hand, Basil said:” There is not a single Christian leader in Lebanon, and they do not compare me to anyone. As long as the popular agency is with me from the mainstream and the people practice it, otherwise I I will go home “.

News

[ad_2]