This is what Basil asked Ambassador Shia as the price for the separation from Hezbollah !!



[ad_1]

If we accept as an argument that this stardom is a true American spectacle, this in itself reveals the naivety, the absurdity and the cheapness of what is offered.

After the media appearance of the head of the Aounist movement and son-in-law of the time, Gebran Bassil, and his vulgar defense of himself after his inclusion on the US sanctions list according to the Magnitsky Law approved specifically to combat the corrupt, thieves and looters of public funds, and after his usual attempt to make it appear that these sanctions are based on purely political background and that he is paying the price of his alliance with Hezbollah and did not give in to US temptations and threats!

This forced the ambassador of the largest country in the world to break her silence, and give him a video interview, contrary to the usual practice of exposing the secretariats of the councils, to undermine Basil’s accusations and lies that the separation from the party is an American demand that was offered to him in exchange for “stardom”, but his presentation in the national interest prevented him from accepting it. The offer, so it was clear, according to the ambassador, that the matter is completely the other way around and that Gebran Bassil was the one who offered the “party separation” merchandise for a price that the American did not agree to, and therefore did not made the desired deal.

It is true that the US ambassador kept the price requested from the seller, Gebran Bassil, a secret, but its knowledge does not require much thought, nor is there a need for information or intelligence leaks to know the amount and type of price requested by Gibran.

Ali bin Abi Talib said: “Nobody hurt anything, but it appeared in the slips of their tongue.” In his press conference, Gebran Bassil said, in his account of the temptations that he claimed the American presented to him, that in exchange for his separation from Hezbollah, he will gain “stardom” in Lebanon and America! !!

Also read: Hezbollah will not be silent on Basilio’s sanctions, and will respond thus

If we accept an argument that this “stardom” is a real American offer, then this in itself reveals the naivety, absurdity, and cheapness of what was offered. If the American thought for a moment that the opposite side with which he is negotiating is a figure of national value and the owner of a real cause, then the spectacle would have been for example “political stability” Economic rescue of the country “,” deposits in the central bank “,” activation of Lebanon’s role in the World Trade Organization “or any proposal related to the great national interest and save Lebanon from the abyss in which it finds itself !!!!

As for the offer and price being personal “stardom,” this only implies (assuming the offer is correct) the American’s knowledge of the right to know the nature of what is being offered.

As for the American ambassador, he lied about the origin of the matter, the natural conclusion here is that whoever offered the American to separate from the party wants nothing more in return than the “stardom” with which he dreams and seeks, and the stardom of the country’s son-in-law. alliance, which everyone near and far knows is only “the presidency of the republic.” The Basilian dream, through which he forges his entire movement, political action, alliances, friendships and enmities,

And the Lebanese child knows that the Aounist current, which does not intersect with Hezbollah, neither near nor far, and as Bassil himself declares about the internal and external differences with him, and therefore the only basis that remains on which Marmakhael settles and the lung that breathes and drifts from him, is to Reach Baabda with the uncle earlier and hope to find her with the brother-in-law later.

In sum, if the presidency of the republic and the arrival in Baabda is the price of Marmikhael’s role of understanding, then that same price is required to break this role, and this is what neither Shi nor the party have provided Gibran until now.

The article expresses the opinion of its author and is not necessarily the policy of the site.

[ad_2]