[ad_1]
Dahia’s rule over Beirut displaced all Lebanese, and the presence of Christians was not protected by guarantees
It is true that the sanctions imposed on him by the United States under the Magnitsky Act were caused by “his systematic corruption, the exploitation of his authority and official positions, and their use to serve his personal purposes and the interests of those close to him” ( …) according to the statement from the United States Treasury, however, the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, Representative Gebran Bassil, challenged Washington. Yesterday, a piece of evidence was presented to prove these charges and, on the other hand, it gave the reason for its objective elsewhere: its alliance with Hezbollah.
The hand of the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun al-Yamani, said political sources monitoring Al-Markaziyah, confirmed that the Americans had been pressuring him for years to break his association with Hezbollah, sometimes with intimidation and sometimes with intimidation, but he continued to refuse until sanctions were imposed. But it is noteworthy in his account of what happened, which said the following: “When the United States asked me to leave Hezbollah, I said that this would lead to internal discord.” He continued: “When the US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, asked me to leave Hezbollah and confront him, I explained that this leads to the isolation of the Shiites, that is, it leads to internal conflicts, so can we find you? at your place of foreign affairs when the conflict occurs to help us avoid bloodshed? ” And when I asked, is it guaranteed that sedition will not occur? Certainly his answer was negative.
According to sources, this position constitutes an “accusation” by Hezbollah. Basil seems to say that if Hizbullah finds itself without significant political allies, it will attack the Lebanese interior with weapons, using its surplus power against its compatriots. Otherwise, how can conflicts be generated? Sources ask. So, will Hezbollah accept this position, and can it really direct its weapons again towards the issue of the Lebanese if the political equation changes and no longer suits their interests? The sources continued: “For example, the Lebanese Forces today, for example, lack a real and wide network of allies, and are somewhat alone in their position and political options, and consider that” the revolutionary people are their allies. “So Can Maarab, for example, decide to open a war on the ground and threaten civil peace, because he is “alone”? Absolutely not, so why would Hezbollah then, according to Bassil? Basil’s position does not serve the movement or Hezbollah, and indicates that the understanding of Mar Mikhael was carried out out of fear and inferiority, as if someone decided to submit to a strong man for fear of using his power against him, and indicates that he did not. between two peer-to-peer parties, united by points of convergence or a common vision to build a better nation …
Furthermore, Bassil asked: “Where is the interest of the United States in the political assassination of Christian leaders who publicly ask for cooperation and friendship with him?” “This is a project of chaos that leads to the migration of Christians from the region, and this is a recipe for war,” he said. This talk also stopped sources who believe that Basil went too far in his analysis. Imposing sanctions on it will not provoke the migration of Christians from Lebanon and the region, noting that Hezbollah imposed its control over the political decision in Beirut that originally “took care” of this task, so the Arabs and the Gulf countries moved away from Lebanon. and they isolated him from the international community and his Arab environment, and pushed the situation in him to the bottom, which caused migration. All Lebanese, not just Christians. Sources also consider that the presence of Christians in Lebanon was never linked to external or international guarantees, and they never needed the protection or patronage of anyone. They rose up on many occasions against the world and the will of their main capitals, and they knew how to preserve their presence in Lebanon, and this is what happened in 1975, when they responded with raw flesh to an important decision to turn their country into an alternative homeland for the Palestinians, so they could have what they wanted and stay in their land and strangers and their sympathizers abandoned it. Regional and international …
And then, and in immediate politics, Bassil confirmed yesterday that a government birth has become impossible without Prime Minister Hariri fulfilling his terms: either a comprehensive rotation that also affects finances, or no rotation, with his insistence on appoint Christian ministers. After the sanctions, Hizbullah will clearly support Basil’s demands. Will Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri give him what he wants?
Source: Central News Agency
[ad_2]
