[ad_1]
It has become clear, then, that Republicans and Democrats are preparing for the possibility of court battles after the elections, which Trump himself confirmed, saying in the last days of his campaign that he does not expect to win without going to court. Ultimately, the litigation will depend on how close the results are to the initial count. However, Trump had alluded to these demands, when he repeatedly questioned the method of voting by mail, believing it would lead to an increase in fraud and demanding that the results be announced at the end of election day. While his deputy campaign manager, Garsten Clark, has assured that the campaign will resist any attempt by Democrats to miss the deadline, Biden’s campaign manager, Jennifer O’Malley, has made it clear that Donald Trump will not be declared the winner. Election night, no way. Consequently, it appears that the Supreme Court justices are ready to adjudicate any legal battle that may take place, especially in light of the intense polarization between Democrats and Republicans, in addition to the mail-in vote of a record number of Americans. The cases in some states only helped outline a possible electoral conflict and, in some cases, laid the groundwork for it.
Texas
In one of the first tests of efforts in this area, a state federal judge ruled yesterday against local Republicans, who wanted to force state officials to deposit more than 127,000 ballots at newly created polling places in the area of Houston. The federal court ruling, which Republicans said they would appeal, came after a state court also ruled against him. This means that the Texas Supreme Court twice rejected the Republican appeals, but they can appeal the federal case to the United States Supreme Court, which predicts there may be more controversy in the matter.
Pennsylvania
It is an important mandate for both candidates and their electoral rules are unstable. Mail-in ballots that arrive three days after Nov. 3 are apparently valid according to a state court ruling, but elections officials separate them, pending further litigation. Although the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the requests of the Republicans to cancel the extension, the case remains, while Trump denounced the decision of the court, especially since the late ballots could be of great importance in the presidential report.
These cards, along with Pennsylvania rules prohibiting authorities from scheduling early voting before Election Day, mean that the state winner may not be decided for several days. Republicans had thwarted efforts to change the rules that would have allowed early vote counting. They also filed a lawsuit in federal court yesterday morning, demanding that certain votes be withdrawn in Montgomery County, alleging that the county illegally viewed the ballot papers, meaning they had been recorded, prior to November 3, and allowed some voters to fix problems with the cards. Theirs. However, a district spokesman said officials believed the process was “robust and permissible” and that a court hearing on the case would soon be held.
Litigation will depend on how close the results are to the initial count.
Minnesota
It is one of the most competitive states in the Midwest and has also been the subject of litigation over vote-by-mail deadlines. Like Pennsylvania, this state is preparing to rack up a batch of separate ballots that could be instrumental in a tight race. State election officials, in a move approved by a Minnesota state court, extended the deadline for mailing vote-by-mail ballots to seven days, provided they are mailed by Nov. 3. However, Republicans sued to avoid the extension, and in a split ruling last week, the Federal Court of Appeals sided with them, in a preliminary ruling ordering that ballots arrive after the day of the elections remain separate and without counting, pending new demands.
North Carolina
Meanwhile, voting deadlines are being questioned in North Carolina, and the State Board of Elections says mail-in ballots can arrive within six days of November 3. Last week, the Supreme Court refused to issue an injunction against the extension, but the case is still pending in the lower courts.
Wisconsin
Another major state in the Midwest, voting deadlines have been extended, but by a federal judge rather than by state authorities. Last week, the United States Supreme Court rejected a request by Democrats to allow an extension, after an appeals court blocked it. Wisconsin is one of the top battlegrounds in the Midwest and you can’t count the first few votes before Election Day, which means announcing a winner can be slow.
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
