[ad_1]
The head of the “Lebanese Forces” party, Samir Geagea, stated that “there is communication through” strong “officials with the groups of the revolution, distinguishing between” groups of people who participated in the “revolution”, which was the “revolution real “, and between groups that spoke in the name of” the revolution. ” He asks: “Where was the ‘revolution’ when Prime Minister Saad Hariri was reassigned to form the government? She was absent, but that does not mean that people agreed with what happened, “noting that she has many notes on the performance of groups” that are eager to summarize this revolution and have not been able to revive it since last June.
In a press interview, Geagea listed the reasons why the “forces” refrained from participating in the demonstrations, including “the presentation of groups of demands such as changing the electoral law and other important controversial issues, and some living in a past past as if they didn’t realize that Stalin was gone. ” The chaos witnessed by many demonstrations, and the pressure exerted on the security forces, necessitated clashes with the protesters. This is something we do not want because stability is our priority, while the objective of the “revolution” for us is an economic sustenance “.
In response to a question that after the four-year test of the era, would you have voted for Aoun if the election were today? Geagea replied, “We would not have chosen Aoun, of course, but we acted differently.” He was asked: Why the pact has not been fulfilled, until today, is it the circumstances, the environment of the president or the role of Gebran Bassil? He said: “The impact of circumstances is limited, especially if there is a will to achieve achievements, but the four years were bad. We do not hold the president of the republic responsible for everything that happened in the country, but, at the same time, not Serious attempts were made to reform the situation, on the contrary, the losses increased with respect to what happened in the country. ” It was before time. “
He commented on the issue of the relationship of “forces” with the “Pact” going from the coalition, to the opposition to Bassil with the neutralization of Aoun, to the rivalry with the two, saying: “We fight with everyone, not only with Aoun and Bassil, even with Hariri, with whom we were united by an alliance that lasted 13 Sunnahs, because we had principles and we did not want to be with anyone, but in the position we should be in. “
He continued: “Two months ago, there was a wave calling for us to resign from the House of Representatives, and we were subjected to some spontaneous attacks and some of the largest deliberate ones, but we had long sessions to discuss the matter and we saw that resignation may be profitable for the foreseeable future, but loses our ability to influence and oppose from within the House of Representatives. ” As we do today. “
In response to a question about the opposition to the “forces”, today it appears only verbal. Where will the files be opened? Geagea said: “The opposition today is not because of the files, but because of the larger file, which is the existence of the current authority that needs to be restructured. We do not forget the social concern that requires a great effort on our part, since we distribute large amounts of food aid and medicines, and we do great social work. In the areas affected by the port explosion “.
Geagea added: “The forces’ relations with the outside, especially with the Arab world, are the best among all political forces,” noting the ability of the “forces” to communicate with various political forces, with the exception of Hezbollah, which is not something. Available at another party “.
He stressed that “there is contact with the Free Patriotic Movement, although we are no longer in a relationship of allies. Let’s say it is communication” on the block.
Regarding the relationship with the Future Movement, Geagea stated: “We agreed with him on March 14, and we still agree with him on the strategic line, but when the internal situation became a priority, they began to emerge differences and differences “.
What if he calls what Hariri is doing suicide, as some describe it? He said: “We believe that the risks of what you do are much greater than the possibility of success, but we will not delay in taking any positive steps that your government takes.”
As for giving the government confidence? Geagea emphasized that “the matter depends on the method of government formation, but what is happening so far is not encouraging.”
Regarding the validity of his position regarding the celebration of a Maronite summit in Bkerke, he stressed: “This is true, because the dispute today is not Christian-Muslim, but with some Christians, specifically the Free Patriotic Movement, and with some Muslims, specifically Hezbollah. “
Geagea described the relationship with the Marada movement as “fluid”: “We communicate and hold meetings, especially at union polling stations, and we do not attack each other and we are interested in good neighborliness, and each of us knows what you can get from the other “.
On the fourth anniversary of the election of President Michel Aoun, Geagea commented: “I do not envy him for what he is doing. President Aoun had a golden opportunity to become a patriotic hero, and when he fulfilled his promise, there were political forces around him with which he could fill the accumulated gaps, but what happened after four years is that these legal gaps increased dozens. times. I personally tried, repeatedly, to draw your attention to many errors, and also held a series of meetings in my office with officials of the “current” about the electrical file, before we came out in our opposition to the public, without succeeding in convincing them to change focus. “
[ad_2]
