To speed up the formation … a statement from the “National Movement”

The political body of the “Free Patriotic Movement” held its periodic meeting headed by Representative Gebran Bassil, and discussed its agenda and made decisions in this regard, and called, in a statement, to “accelerate the formation of the government and not bind this internal law to any external factor or development, so the formation of the Lebanese government is a Lebanese matter and a constitutional duty. ” Lebanon cannot afford to waste time. “

And while the commission affirmed respect for the unity of constitutional and constitutional standards in the training process, it recalled that “the French initiative with its reform points needs an effective and productive government of ministers who are capable of implementing the program. and are specialists in their field of study, which means the need to have a specialized minister at the head of each ministry and thus The assignment of more than one ministerial portfolio to a minister is a blow to the principle of specialization, especially if the minister charges arbitrarily between two portfolios that have no relation to the competition of one with the other.

The commission announced its insistence and adherence to conducting a criminal audit of the Bank of Lebanon accounts as a mandatory first step on the road to reform. Therefore, the movement will not sit idly by any attempt to obstruct the audit. An investigation that would reveal the fate of wasted, gifted and transferred money and how it was spent in recent years.

The commission insisted that “the reasons for the collapse of Lebanon as a consequence of the accumulation of debts, the persistence of corruption and the decline of the economy to the point of atrophy and depression must be determined to correct them and not for any other objective. “. The body politic affirms that the movement will use all means of pressure to uncover the facts and confront political, legislative and popular obstructions. “.

In its statement, the political commission indicated that it considers with great concern the facts that contradict the principles of freedom, dialogue and coexistence between cultures and religions in France, since the commission categorically rejects the damage to religious symbols and the sacred things of the peoples and religions and warns of repression and the consequences of contempt for them, condemns and, in return, rejects asylum. To violence, murder and physical abolition under the pretext of defending beliefs, and therefore, one cannot stand idly by in the face of brutality and hate speech that incites the murder of others. “

And he rejected “insulting or demonizing the Islamic religion not only by those who are exposed to its symbols, but also by exploiting it by those who claim to defend it while using it to achieve political and expansionist goals as it is known and exposed.”