[ad_1]
First: How is it correct to view exposure to certain skin in the world as racist when it is, and how exposure to Israelis is considered anti-Semitic, while exposure to Islam and Muslims is considered freedom of speech and democracy?
Secondly, there is no doubt that the French president is in crisis, and to get out of this crisis, he decided to go to the extreme right and began to launch a campaign against the Islamic religion and attack the Messenger, peace be upon him and defend everyone who is exposed to the Messenger, because he has a problem with Turkey expanding, including the gas issue, I will not address this issue now. So Macron decided to put the Islamic religion in the foreground. This is not freedom of opinion and democracy because it is on the edge of harming others and we are among those who have suffered this abuse, because our Prophet represents for us religion in all its values and morals in which we were raised. If any of the elements carry out an irregular action, the person is blamed and not the religion.
The third issue is related to the political parties and currents in Lebanon that claim to represent Muslims, so far no convictions have been issued. I understand that there is a French newspaper and settlements are taking place in the region and there are contacts. But this has nothing to do with defending our religion, our values, and the teachings of our religion. He orders us not to differentiate between one of his messengers, and they said: “We heard and we obeyed.” We are among those who have listened and obeyed, we do not accept exposure to anyone’s religion and, at the same time, we do not accept exposure to our religion. “
He concluded: “Furthermore, Almighty God commanded us” and discussed with them which is better. Therefore, the real reaction is to adhere to the teachings of our religion. “
