[ad_1]
After much leaks and expectations, the Sudanese capital Khartoum popularized the “Three No” principle, which stayed true to it for years and, forcedly or voluntarily, became the “Friends of Israel” list..
Khartoum, from which the Arab summit emerged in 1967, affirmed that “there is no peace, there is no recognition, nor negotiation with Israel”, even though it is famous as the “capital of the Three No”, it joined the assembly on Friday. of printed countries, to write a new era in the history of the region..
Early on Friday, the US president announced that Sudan had agreed to fully normalize relations with “Israel”, after joint contact with Sudanese prime ministers, Abdullah Hamdok, and (Zionist) Benjamin Netanyahu..
Trump said at a press conference at the White House that “the normalization agreement between Sudan and (the entity) was concluded without a drop of blood in the sand,” according to the American Associated Press..
With the normalization of Sudan, it will become the fifth Arab country to formally agree to “peace” with the Zionist occupation entity, after Bahrain and the Emirates (2020), and before them Jordan (1994) and Egypt (1979) ..
The Sudanese seek a way out of their economic crises, but this time from the door of (the entity of the Zionist enemy), with the aim of opening up to the outside world, after the overthrow of the regime of President Omar al-Bashir (1989: 2019) ..
Since last February, controversy has prevailed over the possibility of normalization after a meeting between the head of the Sudanese sovereign council, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the prime minister of the Zionist enemy, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the impact of relations with Tel Aviv on the terms of Khartoum..
The Sudanese street is divided between those who see normalization with the enemy entity as an economic gain that helps alleviate the living crises, and those who see that it will impose more restrictions on the country, but of another type..
Sudanese experts believe that Sudan can reap economic benefits if it makes the decision to normalize, including the use of modern technologies for the enemy entity in the field of agriculture, which would contribute to a major productivity boom in Sudan..
However, in addition to the fields of electricity generation, communications and research, the experts also highlighted that the maximum economic benefit will be in favor of (the Zionist entity), due to its continuous search for a country that is its gateway to the continent. African..
Sudan suffers new crises of bread, flour, fuel and cooking gas. Due to the high exchange rate of the dollar against the pound in the unofficial market, record figures.
Contrary to probability
News of Sudanese normalization with (the enemy entity) dominated the lifting of Sudan’s name from the list of states sponsoring terrorism, as the White House announced, early Friday, that Trump had informed Congress of his intention to remove Sudan from the terrorism list..
Since 1993, the United States has included Sudan on this list, for harboring the late al Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden at the time..
Perhaps the coincidence between removing Sudan’s name from the terrorism list and announcing its normalization with (the enemy entity) showed the Khartoum government as having given in to US pressure, and accepting normalization as a condition for removing Sudan. from the list, which imposes on Sudan a mostly international isolation..
It is striking that many Sudanese officials welcomed the news of the lifting of sanctions through their official pages on “Twitter and Facebook”, then their silence on the conversation after the normalization announcement with (the Zionist entity)..
Observers believe that this silence from Sudanese officials shows that the normalization decision will have wide domestic consequences, due to expected objections, in addition to the fact that Sudan is fundamentally unstable, witnessing security incidents and suffering from severe economic crises..
Furthermore, experts indicate that normalization can generate confusion even within the government’s political incubator, as the Umma, Nationalist, Communist and Baath parties (the ruling coalition parties in the Declaration of the Forces for Freedom and Change) announced their rejection before the normalization process with (the entity) “..
Certainly, this “may lead to a split in the authority of the transition period,” according to experts..
On August 21, 2019, a transition period that lasts 39 months began in Sudan and ends with the elections, during which power is shared by the army and the “Declaration of the Forces of Freedom and Change”, leader of the movement popular..
The People’s Congress Party (opposition) said it rejects normalization and that “Israel” is a hostile state, while the Sudanese “Baath” (socialist) party announced political and social contacts to form a front against normalization with “Israel” ..
And on Thursday, the National Umma Party (within the ruling coalition) threatened to withdraw its support for the transitional authority in the country, if it proceeded with normalization, because it does not have the right to do so, in accordance with the fact that the Main contentious issues require a democratic government, not the tasks of a transitional government..
Suppression and revolution
Analysts believe that Sudan’s agreement with (the entity) and the United States will open the door to a new wave of repression in the country, given that the government has found it international support that allows it to practice repression and repress freedoms, especially from those who reject the agreement or those who oppose it..
Journalist Muhammad Omar says: “The political position of the government of Sudan, represented by the Council of Ministers and the Sovereign, in agreeing to normalization with” Israel “, does not depart from the fact that it is a search for their interests in the government of Sudan and not the Sudanese people..
Omar added, to Anadolu Agency: “Political parties and military supporters of normalization with Israel express a political position, which is in their interest, not in the interest of Sudan.”.
In addition, the government of Abdallah Hamdok, until the last moment, insisted that removing Sudan from the terrorism list is a different path to normalization, but what happened in terms of normalization immediately after the Sudan uprising brings into play the credibility of the Hamdok government..
These criticisms of Hamdok’s government place him in a confrontation with the people, and recall his demonstrations against the Omar al-Bashir regime and his overthrow in April 2019 due to the lack of transparency of his regime and his imposition of a de facto policy. to town..
On September 28, Hamdok said that the issue of the normalization of his country’s relations with “Israel” “is complex and needs social consensus.” Hamdok refused, at the time, “to link the normalization process (with Israel) to the question of removing Sudan from the list of sponsoring countries. To terrorism.
The Sudanese are waiting for what will emerge in the coming days, and amid the expectations of experts that political, economic and security conditions will worsen over the next period, and the United States and Europe promise to open up to “Israel” and support it. in billions of dollars.. (Source: Anadolu Agency)
