[ad_1]
Remembering the legacy of the former secretary of state was intentional at the time, as current President Donald Trump’s campaign is in crisis, and the prospects for a second term are almost excluded according to frequent opinion polls. Trump wanted to say that he would win against former Vice President Joe Biden, as he did in the 2016 election against Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and that he would once again disappoint the results of the polls that unanimously agreed that she would win those elections. And he meant that his electoral struggle with Biden goes beyond his person to the administration of Barack Obama with all its symbols and policies. This was a call to align himself within his Republican party, as voices began to rise, affirming his loss, expecting an “electoral massacre” for the entire party in the Congressional elections.
In bold words, he called Obama, Biden and Hillary “traitors” who caused enormous political damage to the United States, citing the emails he ordered released, with no consistent circumstances to justify such behavior. The previous administration can demonstrate the responsibility to harm the interests of other countries, but it does not affect the interests and strategies of the United States, whose successive administrations have done more than harm the peoples of the Third World and their basic rights. This was not a leak, as everything was done deliberately and publicly, and in accordance with the procedures that were followed.
It was also not possible to reopen the investigation with the former minister, as she was subjected to an investigation into the way she handled her emails, and the violation of traditions and rules that it involved, before the FBI, and was heard before a specialized committee in the Chamber of Representatives.
In the internal American division, the intention was clear, and there were no significant debates, while here, with the expansion of the region, it was subjected to an article of excessive political use, since each party collects what supports its narrative of the history and turns a blind eye to any information that undermines its credibility.
There is almost nothing new in Hillary’s letters, as she personally testified about what happened in a published book. Regarding the degree of secrecy and the importance of what is disclosed, the texts of the correspondence are not considered first class documents, and are not compared with the minutes of the White House meetings with heads of state, or deliberations with other foreign ministers, or diplomatic reports drawn up by ambassadors in places of conflict of wills, or with texts of understandings with agencies. Intelligence in hot regions of the world.
Hillary’s letters are hastily written impressions and information that, if studied slowly, may contain signs that illuminate and reveal something of the hidden and unknown in conflicts over territory.
In Hillary’s letters, the “Muslim Brotherhood” file appeared to be the most exciting. There were no unknown developments, but it indicated once again the amount of sabotage that the United States played to abort the “January Revolution” and divert it from its true objectives of seeking to build a modern, democratic and civil state, and the extent of the involvement that the group has reached as a price to come to power at the expense of any national or national value. .
The careful reading of the messages in the most objective way possible helps to understand what may happen in the future, if Biden reaps the results of the November 3 elections, given that he was a present party and a partner of the Obama administration.
Questions are raised about the positions the Biden administration may take on the region’s incendiary archives, the most dangerous of which is the future of the Iranian nuclear deal, the fate of the so-called “deal of the century,” and post-normalization scenarios. which is expanding unexpectedly, until the Israeli era is almost announced in large numbers. From the Arab countries, at the expense of Egypt and its traditional role in the Arab world.
Before we ask ourselves what Biden would do if he were elected president, we must ask ourselves: Where are we from from what is happening around us? What is our position on our main problems? Why did we lose weight in our region, until our fate became dependent on who won the US elections?
The entire world is watching and following the noisy American controversies that, in some settings, threaten chaos, chaos and a second civil war, if Trump refuses to accept the election results. We are not the only ones watching and following, but some here in the Gulf are betting on Trump as a matter of life and death, and they almost gleefully pick up any signal that reassures them that he will not leave the White House!
Trump does not deserve any sympathy for him, insofar as he damaged the Palestinian cause and underestimated the entire Arab world, not even Biden, the representative of the Muslim Brotherhood, who is expected in the White House. Such conclusions are incredibly naive.
In the early days of the “January Revolution,” a struggle broke out within the American White House, especially in the National Security Council, between the two guards, the old and the new. Veterans tended to keep Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on the grounds that he was a trusted and proven ally. The youth tended to change and eliminate the “old dictator.” Neither Hillary nor Biden were in favor of change. This is a true fact, but the avalanche of accidents and the fall of the legitimacy of Mubarak in the streets and squares, led necessarily to seek to employ them in the interests of the United States.
They bet on the “Brotherhood” as the largest organized political force in the country. Contacts and understandings were made, the main heading of which is the recognition of Israel and the normalization of relations with it. This was part of a strategic vision to reorganize the region, by shedding the burdens of consumer systems.
In 2007, the well-known leader of the “Muslim Brotherhood”, Essam El-Erian, issued controversial statements calling for the return and compensation of Egyptian Jews. This was a deliberate announcement of secret understandings that took place in many European capitals, the most important of which is the Italian capital Rome, as it was leaked and published at the time.
In Trump’s vision, it achieved the core of the strategic goal of allowing Israel to lead the region with successive normalization agreements with him, moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, and providing political cover for further expansion and settlement without clashing with countries. allies, and while continuing to financially blackmail him in the name of defense. about her.
Biden’s approaches may differ, and he may press the archive of human rights and freedoms for further strategic concessions in favor of Israel, as the George W. Bush administration did after the 2003 occupation of Iraq.
Keep in mind that most Jewish votes will go to Biden, not Trump, who did for Israel what no previous president did. This is a fact that has an explanation in the political structure of the Jewish community, which, like other minorities, has traditionally aligned itself with the Democratic Party. Unlike Obama and Trump, Biden has a long and rich experience in international politics, which he has served for years in the United States Senate. He neither needs new lessons, nor does he look in the mirror in “The Hillary Letters.”
* Egyptian writer and journalist
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
